Is neutrino spin-parity 1/2+ or 1/2-?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cairoliu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    neutrino parity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the spin and parity of neutrinos, specifically whether neutrinos possess a parity of +1 or -1. Participants explore the implications of weak interactions on neutrino parity and the definitions of parity in the context of particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that while neutrinos have a spin of 1/2, their parity is not clearly defined, as weak interactions do not conserve parity.
  • There is confusion about the meaning of "positive sign of parity," with references made to other particles like protons and electrons, which are considered to have a positive parity.
  • One participant suggests that if the parity of the anti-neutrino is +1, it leads to a contradiction in the context of beta decay, where parity is not conserved.
  • Another participant emphasizes that weak charged current interactions couple only to left-handed particles, which complicates the notion of neutrino parity.
  • Some participants express a desire for mathematical clarity regarding parity conservation in weak interactions, suggesting that equations should provide insight into the behavior of neutrinos.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the parity of neutrinos. There are multiple competing views regarding the implications of weak interactions on neutrino parity and the interpretation of related concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of parity in the context of weak interactions, highlighting that the standard model's treatment of neutrinos may not align with previous understandings of particle parity.

cairoliu
Messages
51
Reaction score
3
Wikipedia only tells neutrino spin 1/2, but no tell parity sign: positive or negative?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
PeterDonis said:
What do you mean by "parity sign"?
Because I know protons, neutron, electron all 1/2+ spin with positive sign of parity, but only know neutrino 1/2 spin.
 
cairoliu said:
Because I know protons, neutron, electron all 1/2+ spin with positive sign of parity

Again, what do you mean by "positive sign of parity"? Please give a reference.
 
PeterDonis said:
Again, what do you mean by "positive sign of parity"? Please give a reference.
Jπ always comes together, if Jπ = 1/2+, it means spin = 1/2, parity = +1.
I need know neutrino's Jπ, 1/2+ or 1/2- ? At least J = 1/2 is sure, but π = +1 or -1?
 
Ok, then the answer is that neutrinos do not have a definite parity, since neutrinos only interact via weak interactions and weak interactions do not conserve parity.
 
Also, in addition to what Peter said, what do you imagine that the parity transformation of a left-handed neutrino is?
 
Orodruin said:
Also, in addition to what Peter said, what do you imagine that the parity transformation of a left-handed neutrino is?
I imagine it as left hand ruled direction of angular momentum vector. right or wrong?
Anyway momentum conserves.
 
  • #10
No, I asked you what you thought the parity transformation of the left-handed neutrino is. Not what the left-handed neutrino is.
 
  • #11
Orodruin said:
No, I asked you what you thought the parity transformation of the left-handed neutrino is. Not what the left-handed neutrino is.
Sorry, no idea, please teach me.
For the neutron decay: n -> p + e + anti-neutrino
If parity of anti-neutrino = +1, then left = +1 = right = (+1)*(+1)*(+1) = +1.
But parity not conserved in beta decay weak interaction, then it seems the parity of anti-neutrino = -1, then left not equal right. Just confused.
 
  • #12
PeterDonis said:
Ok, then the answer is that neutrinos do not have a definite parity, since neutrinos only interact via weak interactions and weak interactions do not conserve parity.
Thanks for your answer.
Last little confused:
"do not have a definite parity" means parity of neutrino could be +1 or -1 both possible?
 
  • #13
It means that it does not make sense to talk about the parity of a neutrino in the way you are imagining. Weak charged current interactions only couple to left-handed particles, which break parity maximally. There are no right-handed neutrinos in the standard model.
 
  • #14
I like to think symbolically and mathematically, and let equation itself tell whether parity conserve. Therefore if there is a value for neutrino parity, then beta decay equation can mathematically show non-conservation of parity, not by fuzzy words.
 
  • #15
There is nothing about fuzzy words in the standard model. It is a well defined theory. That you do not understand that some concepts that you have learned previously are not applicable to weak decays does not mean that weak decays are non-mathematical.
 
  • #16
cairoliu said:
I like to think symbolically and mathematically, and let equation itself tell whether parity conserve.

The equations governing the weak interactions of neutrinos are easily found in textbooks or online.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K