B Is Newton's first law of motion applicable when walking?

AI Thread Summary
Newton's first law of motion states that an object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force. While this law is always applicable, walking involves complex forces that create unbalanced external forces, making a straightforward application misleading. For instance, walking at a constant speed does not mean one won't tire, as energy is expended to overcome friction and maintain balance. Therefore, while the law provides a foundational understanding, it does not fully account for the dynamics of walking. Overall, Newton's first law does not apply directly to the act of walking due to the presence of these external forces.
Einstein60
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Is Newton's first law of motion applicable when walking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's always applicable. But walking is a complicated process of using forces to drive yourself along and support yourself, so a naive application of it (something like "walking at constant speed shouldn't tire me out at all") won't work.
 
Einstein60 said:
Is Newton's first law of motion applicable when walking?
If we assume that Newton's first law only applies to a body with no unbalnaced external forces, then the answer is no, it does not apply to a person walking.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Newton's first law?
Replies
37
Views
475
I Newton's Third Law: Action & Reaction Along the Line Connecting Two Objects
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Extending Newton's laws -- Is the concept of force still defined?
Replies
35
Views
4K
Insights How to Apply Newton’s Second Law to Variable Mass Systems
Replies
0
Views
2K
Is Newton's third law valid for rotation / Torque?
Replies
23
Views
4K
Newton's 2nd Law confusion: mass times acceleration is not a force?
Replies
39
Views
3K
I 1st law of Newton as a special case of the 2nd law (historical aspect)
Replies
10
Views
3K
B Newton’s second law as one complete law
Replies
27
Views
2K
Understanding Newton's First Law and Referential Inertial on a Moving Earth
Replies
1
Views
1K
Is Newton's Law of Gravity Still Accurate Despite Einstein's Discoveries?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top