B Is Newton's first law of motion applicable when walking?

AI Thread Summary
Newton's first law of motion states that an object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an external force. While this law is always applicable, walking involves complex forces that create unbalanced external forces, making a straightforward application misleading. For instance, walking at a constant speed does not mean one won't tire, as energy is expended to overcome friction and maintain balance. Therefore, while the law provides a foundational understanding, it does not fully account for the dynamics of walking. Overall, Newton's first law does not apply directly to the act of walking due to the presence of these external forces.
Einstein60
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
Is Newton's first law of motion applicable when walking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's always applicable. But walking is a complicated process of using forces to drive yourself along and support yourself, so a naive application of it (something like "walking at constant speed shouldn't tire me out at all") won't work.
 
Einstein60 said:
Is Newton's first law of motion applicable when walking?
If we assume that Newton's first law only applies to a body with no unbalnaced external forces, then the answer is no, it does not apply to a person walking.
 

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Newton's first law?
Replies
37
Views
587
I Newton's Third Law: Action & Reaction Along the Line Connecting Two Objects
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Extending Newton's laws -- Is the concept of force still defined?
Replies
35
Views
5K
Insights How to Apply Newton’s Second Law to Variable Mass Systems
Replies
0
Views
2K
Is Newton's third law valid for rotation / Torque?
Replies
23
Views
5K
Newton's 2nd Law confusion: mass times acceleration is not a force?
Replies
39
Views
3K
I 1st law of Newton as a special case of the 2nd law (historical aspect)
Replies
10
Views
3K
B Newton’s second law as one complete law
Replies
27
Views
2K
Understanding Newton's First Law and Referential Inertial on a Moving Earth
Replies
1
Views
1K
Is Newton's Law of Gravity Still Accurate Despite Einstein's Discoveries?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top