Is Number Theory Too Much to Handle with Other Physics Courses?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of taking a number theory course alongside several physics courses, including Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, and Electromagnetism. Participants explore the rigor of number theory and its compatibility with a heavy course load, while also considering related subjects like Probability Theory and Analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the difficulty of managing number theory with multiple physics courses, acknowledging that individual capabilities vary.
  • Another participant suggests that the rigor of number theory can depend significantly on the instructor and the specific course structure.
  • A participant mentions their recent completion of a course on proofs and expresses anxiety about taking an abstract math course alongside physics, questioning their own readiness.
  • Advice is given regarding the option to drop courses within a certain timeframe if the workload becomes overwhelming.
  • Discussion shifts to Probability Theory, with one participant noting that it can also vary in difficulty based on teaching style and course content.
  • Concerns are raised about Analysis, with participants sharing that it may require a different level of effort compared to previous math courses, particularly regarding epsilon-delta arguments.
  • One participant shares their experience that number theory at their school was manageable and enjoyable, contrasting with the potentially more challenging nature of other advanced courses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the difficulty of number theory or the appropriateness of taking it alongside physics courses. Multiple viewpoints exist regarding the challenges of various math courses, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach for managing course loads.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in course difficulty based on individual teaching styles and institutional differences. There is also mention of prerequisites and the importance of prior experience with proofs, which may affect readiness for advanced courses.

mateomy
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
I was planning on just taking physics courses next quarter (3, maybe 4 total) but I have an interest in taking a number theory course. Would it be too much to pile on with QM, Relativity, a physics-based math course, and part II of E&M? I know this question is impossible to answer because each individual person handles things differently. So let me rephrase the question: How rigorous is Number Theory? Am I potentially putting a gun to my head in attempting to take on these courses all at once? Any advice would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mateomy said:
I was planning on just taking physics courses next quarter (3, maybe 4 total) but I have an interest in taking a number theory course. Would it be too much to pile on with QM, Relativity, a physics-based math course, and part II of E&M? I know this question is impossible to answer because each individual person handles things differently. So let me rephrase the question: How rigorous is Number Theory? Am I potentially putting a gun to my head in attempting to take on these courses all at once? Any advice would be appreciated.

Number Theory, just like many other abstract subjects, can be made extremely difficult or quite manageable, so it really depends on how the class will be run. In my opinion, the most important factor is the instructor. Of course there are always subjects that are inherently more difficult for us to grasp, but a good instructor can really make the difference.

As far as things you can control, you should be comfortable with reading and writing proofs. Usually this is introduced in a course like Linear Algebra, but it is by no means required. It will just require more time on your part if you haven't had any experience writing proofs.
 
Hmmmm, I'm just finishing a course on Proofs this quarter, and I've taken Intro Linear Algebra. But, still kinda nervous taking an abstract math course on top of the physics stuff. Maybe I'm being a wimp.
 
mateomy said:
Hmmmm, I'm just finishing a course on Proofs this quarter, and I've taken Intro Linear Algebra. But, still kinda nervous taking an abstract math course on top of the physics stuff. Maybe I'm being a wimp.

It's good to be cognizant of your limitations; this does not mean you're being a wimp. It is a useful skill to develop and your future employers/advisers will appreciate it.

Does your university permit you to drop courses within a certain time-frame? If so, you can take the course, and within the first few weeks get a feel for what is going to be expected of you. If you find that you aren't going to be able to devote the time necessary to be successful in it, then drop it and try again when your load is a bit lighter.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, we have a one to two week window (I believe). That's good advice and much appreciated. What would/are your thoughts on Probability Theory? None of these classes are required of me, I'm only interested in them.
 
mateomy said:
Yeah, we have a one to two week window (I believe). That's good advice and much appreciated. What would/are your thoughts on Probability Theory? None of these classes are required of me, I'm only interested in them.

My university does have a course titled "Probability Theory", but I haven't taken it yet. Honestly, the only courses about which I've heard horror stories are Analysis, Topology and Functional Analysis. Most complaints are about a given professor's teaching style and/or expectations.
 
Analysis huh? I was actually just signing up for that for the Summer Session. Crap. Haha.
 
mateomy said:
Analysis huh? I was actually just signing up for that for the Summer Session. Crap. Haha.

I am taking Analysis and Abstract Algebra in the fall, so I cannot yet give advice based on personal experience.

However, some of my classmates have taken it and say that most people struggle in the beginning due to unfamiliarity with the epsilon-delta arguments. You will need to work much harder than you did in your Calculus courses. Just be patient and work a lot of the exercises in whatever text you're using. And don't forget about PF. :smile:
 
Can you list the course contents and the book you're using??

If you're planning on ever taking abstract algebra, then it would probably be wise to take abstract algebra first.

As for probability theory, it can be made very easy or extremely hard (just like with number theory). We saw measure-theoretic probability (without even seeing measures or probability), so it was very difficult at the time. Posting a course contents and the book you're using would be good.
 
  • #10
It depends on how they teach it. At my school, Number Theory is an intermediate elective requiring only Calc II as a prereq. We did some proofs and some computational stuff, and overall it wasn't that hard. I thought it was a lot of fun. But your school could be different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K