Is One Textbook Enough for Self-Studying Undergraduate Physics?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
m.gigantic
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can Someone learn all mathematics required for undergraduate physics from only one textbook (mathematical methods in physics texts ) prior to knowing anything in physics especially if he want to self study ? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this method? If I have superficial knowledge in calculus , Can I only read it in a mathematical methods textbook ( I have Riley , Hobson and Bence book which include a chapter on elementary calculus )? Or should I read a calculus book at the level of Stewart book for example ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
m.gigantic said:
Can Someone learn all mathematics required for undergraduate physics from only one textbook (mathematical methods in physics texts ) prior to knowing anything in physics especially if he want to self study ?

All of undergraduate physics? No. Well... maybe if it was a really big book.
 
Probably not one book, but you can follow the standard curriculum set in a uni:

First would be a calculus book, like Stewart's.

Second maybe Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences. I think the second edition you can get super cheap.

Anything you don't understand in Boas you can get clarification in a Diff EQ, Calc, or a Linear Algebra book.