Is Our Everyday Thinking Flawed? Discover the Science Behind Our Daily Mistakes

  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Psychology
AI Thread Summary
A participant in a Masters in Philosophy program shared their experience with a free online course titled "The Science of Everyday Thinking" offered by the University of Queensland. Initially expecting a course on critical thinking, they found it focused on the psychology behind everyday mistakes. The course is described as fascinating and accessible to others interested in the subject. There was a brief discussion about potential concerns regarding course availability, with one participant expressing suspicion about limited sign-up openings. However, they acknowledged their paranoia and congratulated others who may benefit from the course.
Messages
10,922
Reaction score
3,797
Hi Everyone

As part of the Masters in Philosophy program I am doing, I am also taking some free courses offered by other universities. I found one I initially thought was about critical thinking. I was wrong. It's about the psychology of the mistakes we make every day and why we make them. I checked with other mentors, and since it is about experimental results, it is OK to post here if people want to take it. It's free.

https://www.edx.org/learn/thinking/the-university-of-queensland-the-science-of-everyday-thinking

As an aside, it is from the university up the road, the University Of Queensland, and you get a glimpse of their beautiful campus near where I grew up.

I found it fascinating.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Skeptical
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, Greg Bernhardt and Bystander
Biology news on Phys.org
Suspiciously I was told there was exactly one sign-up opening...

But I may just be paranoid.
 
sbrothy said:
Suspiciously I was told there was exactly one sign-up opening...

But I may just be paranoid.

I can't check because I have done the course. It gives me - course completed.

I tried another course, also starting today, Introduction to Data Analytics, and it gave me no problem.

Thanks
Bill
 
As I said: I may be too paranoid. I admit I didn't dig deep enough to offer a real serious opinion, so I will give you and the course the benefit of the doubt. Also I'll congratulate you if you feel you gained something.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top