B Is perpetual motion a forbidden topic in the scientific community?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter robotkid786
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Motion
AI Thread Summary
Perpetual motion machines (PMMs) are deemed impossible because they lose energy, making true perpetual motion unattainable. The discussion highlights the misconception that if PMMs are impossible, it implies the universe has a definite beginning and end. ChatGPT is criticized for providing inaccurate information on physics, and its use as a reference is discouraged in this context. The moderators emphasize that discussions on PMMs are not allowed due to their pseudoscientific nature. The thread has been locked for moderation, reinforcing the community's stance against such topics.
robotkid786
Messages
36
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
If perpetual motion is impossible doesn't that mean that the universe has a definite beginning and end?
I've only just clocked this to be the case. I asked chat gpt and the say big bang has a lot of merit apparently
 
Space news on Phys.org
No. Supposed perpetual motion machines always lose energy to somewhere, which is why true perpetual motion machines are impossible. The universe is all there is - there is nowhere for it to lose energy to. So your analogy is flawed.

Do not trust large language models on physics. They are trained on the internet and there is way too much misinformation and not enough maths.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
robotkid786 said:
TL;DR Summary: If perpetual motion is impossible doesn't that mean that the universe has a definite beginning and end?
Huh? I think perhaps you misunderstand what a PMM is. Your statement is a non-sequitur.
robotkid786 said:
I've only just clocked this to be the case. I asked chat gpt and the say big bang has a lot of merit apparently
(1) Yes, but it only says that because it is true (although it is an understatement). You possibly don't really understand the Big Bang Theory either.
(2) Do NOT use ChatGPT as a reference here. The moderators have decided (rightly I think) that it's not appropriate. It makes too many mistakes.
 
  • Like
Likes robotkid786
Thread locked pending moderation.
 
robotkid786 said:
I asked chat gpt
ChatGPT is not a valid reference here.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and robotkid786
robotkid786 said:
TL;DR Summary: If perpetual motion is impossible doesn't that mean that the universe has a definite beginning and end?

I've only just clocked this to be the case. I asked chat gpt and the say big bang has a lot of merit apparently
PMMs are a forbidden topic at PF (for obvious reasons). Please follow the Insights Article link in the rules quote below for more information. This thread will remain closed.

PF Forbidden Topics said:
Pseudoscience, such as (but not limited to):
Perpetual motion and "free energy" discussions (see our Insights Article here)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpetual_motion
http://www.skepdic.com/freeenergy.html
http://www.skepdic.com/perpetual.html
 
  • Like
Likes robotkid786
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
what is the current status of the field for quantum cosmology, are there any observations that support any theory of quantum cosmology? is it just cosmology during the Planck era or does it extend past the Planck era. what are the leading candidates into research into quantum cosmology and which physics departments research it? how much respect does loop quantum cosmology has compared to string cosmology with actual cosmologists?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
14K
Replies
9
Views
409
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top