Is Pi Entirely Random or Does It Contain Hidden Patterns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter acesuv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Patterns Pi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the mathematical constant pi (π), specifically whether its digits are entirely random or if there are hidden patterns within them. Participants explore concepts related to the randomness of pi, its irrationality, and the implications of its infinite decimal expansion. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects, speculative ideas, and interpretations of pi's properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that while pi is irrational and does not repeat, it is uncertain whether it is a normal number, which would imply that every possible digit combination appears in its decimal expansion.
  • One participant references Carl Sagan's speculation that pi might contain an image of a circle within its digits, highlighting creative interpretations of pi.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of a number being irrational, with some arguing that irrational numbers can still lack certain digit combinations.
  • Several participants challenge the idea that pi contains all possible digit combinations, using examples of other irrational numbers that do not meet this criterion.
  • Some participants express skepticism about popular claims regarding pi's properties found in external links, suggesting that misinformation may be present.
  • The conversation includes references to patterns in pi and the fascination with continued fractions related to pi.
  • Humorous remarks about the film "Life of Pi" are made, indicating a lighter side to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether pi contains all possible digit combinations or if it is a normal number. There are competing views on the implications of pi's irrationality and the nature of its decimal expansion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that while pi contains digits from 0 to 9, this does not necessarily imply that all combinations of digits appear. The discussion highlights the complexity of proving properties related to pi and the limitations of current understanding.

acesuv
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
or is it all random? thanks :approve:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well given that it goes on for an infinite number of digits you are bound to find random sets of seemingly repetitive strings of digits but in the sense that I suspect that you mean it is purely random. If it ever started to repeat one string of digits forever then it would be a rational number, but it is not ... it is irrational.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
My favorite is the Carl Sagan speculation in his sci-fi novel Contact, that PI has embedded within its infinite digits the image of a circle how ever you choose the interpret the digits.

There's a lot of creative PI art that can be found via Google Image search "PI art" and here's a couple of links:

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...fZRp8zgfqIRGqQtj8f_Jk-lQ&ust=1400951799993306

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...fZRp8zgfqIRGqQtj8f_Jk-lQ&ust=1400951799993306

but no circle's been found yet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
acesuv said:
or is it all random? thanks :approve:
You are essentially asking whether pi is a normal number. Whether it is or isn't is unknown. It's very hard to prove whether a number is normal.

Consider the following base 10 number: 0.101001000100001000001... This number is irrational, but it is not normal.
 
Some amazing properties of Pi that you may be interested in:
https://scontent-b-sin.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10405247_833595243328155_8157491092640025910_n.jpg
 
adjacent said:
Some amazing properties of Pi that you may be interested in:
https://scontent-b-sin.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10405247_833595243328155_8157491092640025910_n.jpg

That site says ##\pi## is an infinite non-repeating decimal "meaning that every possible number combination exists somewhere" in the decimal expansion of ##\pi##. No, that means that ##\pi## is irrational. Whether it satisfies that phrase in quotes is an open question.
 
adjacent said:
Some amazing properties of Pi that you may be interested in:
https://scontent-b-sin.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10405247_833595243328155_8157491092640025910_n.jpg

LCKurtz said:
That site says ##\pi## is an infinite non-repeating decimal "meaning that every possible number combination exists somewhere" in the decimal expansion of ##\pi##. No, that means that ##\pi## is irrational. Whether it satisfies that phrase in quotes is an open question.

Yes. The link provided by adjacent contains a lot of misinformation. I'm only leaving the post up because the link is very popular on the internet, so it would be good to debunk it here. So all the readers should be aware that it is very problematic.
 
LCKurtz said:
No, that means that ##\pi## is irrational.
Pi is irrational, is it not?

micromass said:
Yes. The link provided by adjacent contains a lot of misinformation. I'm only leaving the post up because the link is very popular on the internet, so it would be good to debunk it here. So all the readers should be aware that it is very problematic.
Would you mind explaining why it's problematic and contains misinformation?
 
  • #10
adjacent said:
Pi is irrational, is it not?
Would you mind explaining why it's problematic and contains misinformation?

A sequence of decimal digits can be non-repeating without having to contain all possible subsequences.

For instance, 0.101001000100001... is irrational. It's decimal expansion never repeats. But its decimal expansion also does not contain any 2's.
 
  • #11
Stating some number is irrational means that it is not rational ie you can't define it as the ratio p/q of two integers p and q where q not equal to zero.

Taking that as a definition you can't leap to the conclusion that all possible combinations of digits will appear.

As an example, you could get a non-repeating sequence of digits without the digit 9 appearing anywhere in the sequence and still have an irrational number but not with every combination of digits.
 
  • #12
We already know that Pi contains numbers from 0 to 9. So that means it's proved.
 
  • #13
@adjacent - take 1/90 and add 0.2 to it, does that number have any arbitrary length of the string of 2's in it? Using your logic, it must - despite all indications to the contrary. And I could do the same thing with 1/900 and 0.23 or 1/9000 and 0.234...should I draw a map? Yes, I know that this continuing fraction isn't transcendental. Extending this simple argument to 0.101001etc. is not exactly rocket science.
-=-=-
On a more interesting note: @acesuv: take a look here for some patterns in π:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalized_continued_fraction#.CF.80
-=-=
the whole continued fraction thing is just fascinating...
 
Last edited:
  • #14
adjacent said:
We already know that Pi contains numbers from 0 to 9. So that means it's proved.

The number 0.123456789010010001000010000010... is also irrational and contains numbers from 0 to 9. It still doesn't satisfy the property you want.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #15
micromass said:
The number 0.123456789010010001000010000010... is also irrational and contains numbers from 0 to 9. It still doesn't satisfy the property you want.
I think that the author of the [STRIKE]post[/STRIKE] image meant that a digit can be used as many times you want. He must have thought without considering the reality.
:biggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • #16
adjacent said:
I think that the author of the post meant that a digit can be used as many times you want. He must have thought without considering the reality.
:biggrin:

Exactly. And it is currently unknown that every digit in ##\pi## occurs as many times as you want.
 
  • #17
adjacent said:
We already know that Pi contains numbers from 0 to 9. So that means it's proved.
That means what is proved?

adjacent said:
I think that the author of the post meant that a digit can be used as many times you want. He must have thought without considering the reality.
:biggrin:
What post are you talking about?
 
  • #18
HallsofIvy said:
That means what is proved?
It is proved that you can have all the combinations of digits.( I have just realized that this is wrong)
HallsofIvy said:
What post are you talking about?
Sorry,not the post. The https://scontent-b-sin.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1.0-9/10405247_833595243328155_8157491092640025910_n.jpg.
 
  • #19
Ahh, the life of Pi, some people get eaten by tigers and some not so much.
 
  • #20
jedishrfu said:
Ahh, the life of Pi, some people get eaten by tigers and some not so much.
What do you mean? I don't understand.
 
  • #21
adjacent said:
What do you mean? I don't understand.

Google for "life of pi"
 
  • #22
micromass said:
Google for "life of pi"
Oh. A film.
[offtopic]
btw, you guys should learn this: If someone asks for a simple answer which can be found from the first result of google, give him a link like this.

I laughed so much
[/offtopic]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K