Is Point P in Young's Double Slit Experiment the Center of the Central Minimum?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around Young's Double Slit Experiment, specifically questioning whether Point P, located symmetrically between two slits, is the center of the central minimum. The problem involves concepts of wave interference and path difference related to light waves passing through the slits.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conditions for destructive interference at Point P, questioning the application of optical length differences and the phase relationship of light waves from the slits. There are attempts to clarify the implications of the angle of incidence and its effect on interference patterns.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising doubts and seeking clarification on the relationship between path length, phase differences, and the conditions for minima. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of angles and their impact on interference, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the problem's wording, particularly regarding the angle θ and its reference point, which may affect the understanding of the interference conditions.

pardesi
Messages
337
Reaction score
0
Q.Suppose that the the light rays in young's Double Slit experiment fall at an angle \theta=\sin^{-1}(\frac{\lambda}{2d}) .Then prove that the the Point P which is the symmetric point on screen between two slits is the centre of central minimum

Necessary Formulaes
for minima the waves should interfere destructively so the path difference \Delta x=\frac{n\lambda}{2}


ATTEMPT
i am not so sure of this but we can have a plane \pi,\pi^{'} with inclination \theta to the plane of slits and through the slits.the \perp distance of the Point P from the plane determines it's phase so the phase difference is difference between the length of perpendiculars from P to the planes =d \sin \theta=\frac{\lambda}{2} which produces destructive interference.

Doubt
My doubt lies on the fact that how do we apply difference in optical lengths concept here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When a plane wave front falls on the slits with an inclination theta,such that it satisfies the condition given in the problem, light coming from the two slits are not in phase. There phase difference is pi, i.e. they are out of phase. When the light from these two slits reach point P, even though they are equidistant from the point P, they produce distructive interference. So there is no need to apply difference in optical length concept.
 
Last edited:
why are they out of phase even though the distance is the same
 
What a confusingly worded question!

θ could be the angle between the incident rays and either a) the plane of the slits or b) the normal to the plane of the slits. It has to be b) for P to be on the central mimimum.

This leads to the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit.

Using this information you can calculate the directions of the maxima and the minima applying the difference in optical lengths concept.
 
In this question a parallel beam of light is illuminating the slits and the plane wave front, which is perpendicular to the parallel beam, makes an angle θ with the plane of the slits.This leads to the path length from the source to the furthest slit being 0.5λ longer than to the nearest slit. So the waves coming from the two slits are not in phase but out of phase. When these waves superimpose at a point P equidistance from the two slits produce distructive interference.
 
thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K