Is Proper Time Invariance Proven?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 5K views
thoughtgaze
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
is proper time invariant? proof? thanks...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thoughtgaze said:
is proper time invariant? proof? thanks...

Proper time is invariant by definition. It's the time read on a clock, for that clock.

It's similar in a way to the probability of throwing a six on a die. Before you start, the chances of getting a six are 1/6. Once you have thrown the die and got a six, the chances of having a six are 1/1.

Similarly, you can manipulate your scenario to get whatever proper time you want, and to that extent it is variable. But once you have your proper time (which has been read from a clock, for that clock), it's invariant.

cheers,

neopolitan
 
thoughtgaze said:
is proper time invariant? proof? thanks...

Yes, it is invariant; by almost by definition. Proper time is the time measured by a clock in a given world line. What you can prove are that the co-ordinate transforms conserve proper time.

Here is a proof for special relativity, that proper time is invariant under the Lorentz transformation.

The increment in proper time du for a clock moving a small distance dx in a small time dt is, by definition
[tex]du^2 = dt^2 - (dx/c)^2[/tex]​

That is for any inertial co-ordinate system.

Suppose we transform to a new co-ordinate system. The Lorenz transformations are
[tex]\begin{align*}<br /> t' & = \gamma ( t - vx/c^2 ) \\<br /> x' & = \gamma ( x - vt ) \\<br /> \intertext{Where}<br /> \gamma & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2)}} \\<br /> \intertext{Hence}<br /> dt' & = \gamma ( dt - (v/c^2).dx ) \\<br /> dx' & = \gamma ( dx - v.dt ) \\<br /> \intertext{Hence}<br /> dt'^2 - (dx'/c)^2 & = \gamma^2 ( ( dt - (v/c^2).dx )^2 - ( dx/c - (v/c).dt )^2 ) \\<br /> & = \gamma^2 ( dt^2 - 2(v/c)(dx/c).dt + (v/c)^2.(dx/c)^2 - (dx/c)^2 + 2(v/c).(dx/c).dt - (v/c)^2.dt^2) \\<br /> & = \gamma^2 ( 1 - (v/c)^2 ) ( dt^2 - (dx/c)^2 ) \\<br /> & = dt^2 - (dx/c)^2<br /> \end{align}[/tex]​
 
sylas said:
Yes, it is invariant; by almost by definition. Proper time is the time measured by a clock in a given world line. What you can prove are that the co-ordinate transforms conserve proper time.

Here is a proof for special relativity, that proper time is invariant under the Lorentz transformation.

bravo, this is all i needed to see thank you very much :)