Is {q(n) * a(n)} = {p(n) * b(n)} (for all integer n's) a Cauchy Sequence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lainyg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the sequence defined by q(n) = Sum(from k=1 to n) 1/n! and whether it constitutes a Cauchy sequence. Participants explore the properties of convergence and the implications of the Cauchy criterion in the context of sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of a Cauchy sequence and the necessary conditions for proving that q(n) converges. There are attempts to relate the sequence to known convergent series, such as the series for e^x, and questions arise about the sufficiency of demonstrating convergence to establish that q(n) is Cauchy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and exploring various approaches to proving the Cauchy property of the sequence. Some suggest using the properties of factorials and the Taylor series expansion, while others question the adequacy of simply stating convergence without a formal proof.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the definition of q(n) and the need for clarity in the summation notation. Additionally, participants note the importance of establishing bounds for the terms involved in the sequence.

lainyg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



q(n) = Sum(from k=1 to n) 1/n!


Exercise 3: Prove that {q(n)}n(forall)Ns is a cauchy sequence.


Homework Equations



none.

The Attempt at a Solution



So many attempts at a solution. I know that a sequence is a cauchy sequence if for all epsilons greater than 0 there exists an N such that m,n >N and therefore the absolute value of q(m) minus (qn) is less than epsilon. A sequence is considered a cauchy sequence of its terms approach a limit (and converge). My problem is with proving this as it is a sum, and not letting it get messy with double factorials. How do I prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you mean the sum of 1/k!, not 1/n!.

Hint 1: If \sum _{k = 1} ^{\infty}\frac{1}{k!} converges, then for any \epsilon > 0, there exists a natural N such that \sum _{k=N} ^{\infty} \frac{1}{k!} < \epsilon

Hint 2: What's the Taylor (or Maclaurin) expansion of ex?
 
OK, so..

if qn converges, then for any epsilon>0 there exists a natural N such that (qn when N=k) is less than epsilon.

With the maclaurin formula we can write that e^x = the sum (from n=0 to infinity) of x^n/n!. Therefore can we just say that since the lim (as n approaches infinity) of q(n) is e, then it converges, and therefore is a cauchy sequence? Or do we still need to show that there's an N such that q(n) is less than epsilon (for any epsilon greater than 0)?
 
I would guess that they are after a more direct proof than just saying 'I know it converges. Thus it is cauchy'. Would it help as a hint to note 1/n!<=1/2^(n) (at least for n>1)?
 
Last edited:
Another: Let {q(n)n} and {p(n)} (for all integer n's) be Cauchy Sequences which are equivalent. Further let {a(n)} and {b(n)} also be Cauchy Sequences which are equivalent.

Show {q(n) * a(n)} = {p(n) * b(n)} (for all integer n's)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K