Undergrad Is quantum gravity still an immensely popular field?

Click For Summary
Research in quantum gravity remains active, with a significant volume of publications still emerging in the field. However, progress towards a definitive solution appears limited compared to previous years. The nature of a "solution" is ambiguous, but it is suggested that it will be recognizable once achieved. Current approaches, such as string theory and loop quantum gravity, have not significantly advanced the understanding of quantum gravity. The challenge lies in the inadequacy of established quantization methods for gravity, which complicates the path forward.
MacMac
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
I was just wondering how much work is being done in the field of quantum gravity nowdays. Is there still a huge volume of research published on the topic? Are we closer to a "solution" nowdays than we were a few years ago? And also, what exactly would constitute a solution to such problem?
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and docnet
Physics news on Phys.org
MacMac said:
1. Is there still a huge volume of research published on the topic?
2. Are we closer to a "solution" nowdays than we were a few years ago?
3. And also, what exactly would constitute a solution to such problem?
1. Yes.
2. Probably not much.
3. Like many other things in real life, it's hard to define in advance, but when we see it we will recognize it.
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn, atyy, docnet and 1 other person
Demystifier said:
when we see it we will recognize it.
Maybe it will predict the value 42 from first principles.
 
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier
Hell yes. It is a major problem that has to be solved, otherwise there are gaps in our model of Nature where quantum effects play a role when strong gravitational fields are present. Honestly though, with conventional approaches to quantum gravity like string theory and loop quantum gravity we aren't really much closer to a solution. Part of the problem is that there is a very formal procedure for quantizing fields I think due to Dirac that just doesn't seem to work with gravity although it works with QED when you make use of renormalization, but how to get around that isn't clear.
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K