I Is quantum gravity still an immensely popular field?

MacMac
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
I was just wondering how much work is being done in the field of quantum gravity nowdays. Is there still a huge volume of research published on the topic? Are we closer to a "solution" nowdays than we were a few years ago? And also, what exactly would constitute a solution to such problem?
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and docnet
Physics news on Phys.org
MacMac said:
1. Is there still a huge volume of research published on the topic?
2. Are we closer to a "solution" nowdays than we were a few years ago?
3. And also, what exactly would constitute a solution to such problem?
1. Yes.
2. Probably not much.
3. Like many other things in real life, it's hard to define in advance, but when we see it we will recognize it.
 
  • Like
Likes martinbn, atyy, docnet and 1 other person
Demystifier said:
when we see it we will recognize it.
Maybe it will predict the value 42 from first principles.
 
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier
Hell yes. It is a major problem that has to be solved, otherwise there are gaps in our model of Nature where quantum effects play a role when strong gravitational fields are present. Honestly though, with conventional approaches to quantum gravity like string theory and loop quantum gravity we aren't really much closer to a solution. Part of the problem is that there is a very formal procedure for quantizing fields I think due to Dirac that just doesn't seem to work with gravity although it works with QED when you make use of renormalization, but how to get around that isn't clear.
 
The annual big string theory conference took place last week. I thought I would make a thread about it, partly because the most prominent post about it anywhere, is probably Peter Woit dismissing it as worthless. I skimmed the live video (links here to slides, videos, and posters). What did I personally find to be of interest? Lara Anderson gave a talk about topology change in heterotic vacua, i.e. transitions between different Calabi-Yau manifolds in the extra dimensions, which turn out...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
997
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K