Is quantum gravity still an immensely popular field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Quantum gravity remains a highly active research field, with a significant volume of publications still emerging. However, the consensus is that the field has not progressed substantially towards a definitive solution compared to previous years. A solution to quantum gravity is difficult to define, but it is acknowledged that recognizing it will be possible once achieved. Current approaches, such as string theory and loop quantum gravity, have not yielded the desired advancements, particularly due to challenges in applying established quantization procedures to gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with general relativity concepts
  • Knowledge of string theory and loop quantum gravity frameworks
  • Basic grasp of quantum field theory and renormalization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest publications in quantum gravity to track ongoing developments
  • Explore the implications of string theory on gravitational phenomena
  • Study loop quantum gravity and its approaches to quantizing spacetime
  • Investigate Dirac's formal procedure for quantizing fields and its limitations in gravity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and students interested in the complexities of quantum gravity and its implications for our understanding of the universe.

MacMac
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
I was just wondering how much work is being done in the field of quantum gravity nowdays. Is there still a huge volume of research published on the topic? Are we closer to a "solution" nowdays than we were a few years ago? And also, what exactly would constitute a solution to such problem?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and docnet
Physics news on Phys.org
MacMac said:
1. Is there still a huge volume of research published on the topic?
2. Are we closer to a "solution" nowdays than we were a few years ago?
3. And also, what exactly would constitute a solution to such problem?
1. Yes.
2. Probably not much.
3. Like many other things in real life, it's hard to define in advance, but when we see it we will recognize it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn, atyy, docnet and 1 other person
Demystifier said:
when we see it we will recognize it.
Maybe it will predict the value 42 from first principles.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Hell yes. It is a major problem that has to be solved, otherwise there are gaps in our model of Nature where quantum effects play a role when strong gravitational fields are present. Honestly though, with conventional approaches to quantum gravity like string theory and loop quantum gravity we aren't really much closer to a solution. Part of the problem is that there is a very formal procedure for quantizing fields I think due to Dirac that just doesn't seem to work with gravity although it works with QED when you make use of renormalization, but how to get around that isn't clear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K