Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner?

AI Thread Summary
"Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon is considered a suitable resource for beginners with a background in high school physics and undergraduate calculus who wish to self-study quantum mechanics. The book is praised for its clarity, although readers should be vigilant about typos that may appear in derivations. While many recommend this book and others in the Demystified series, some argue that self-study may not be ideal for quantum mechanics. It is suggested that enrolling in a college course could provide valuable guidance from an expert, enhancing the learning experience.
murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
TL;DR Summary: Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner for self-studying?

I'm a layman with background in high school physics and undergrad calculus. Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon a good book for self-studying and learning quantum mechanics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's good. All books by McMahon in the demystified series are good. And no, I'm not him. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes Fakhrul Islam, bhobba, dextercioby and 7 others
I also recommend that book ( and his other books ) but you need to keep a close eye on the typos. If you follow any derivations in the book , you should find the typos easy to spot
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Fakhrul Islam, bhobba, murshid_islam and 2 others
murshid_islam said:
TL;DR Summary: Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner for self-studying?

I'm a layman with background in high school physics and undergrad calculus. Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon a good book for self-studying and learning quantum mechanics?
QM should not be left to self-study in my opinion. I recommend taking a course at a local college instead. I say that only based on my own experience taking QM in college and the fact that you then have an expert to ask questions of.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
Back
Top