Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner?

AI Thread Summary
"Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon is considered a suitable resource for beginners with a background in high school physics and undergraduate calculus who wish to self-study quantum mechanics. The book is praised for its clarity, although readers should be vigilant about typos that may appear in derivations. While many recommend this book and others in the Demystified series, some argue that self-study may not be ideal for quantum mechanics. It is suggested that enrolling in a college course could provide valuable guidance from an expert, enhancing the learning experience.
murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
TL;DR Summary: Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner for self-studying?

I'm a layman with background in high school physics and undergrad calculus. Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon a good book for self-studying and learning quantum mechanics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's good. All books by McMahon in the demystified series are good. And no, I'm not him. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Skeptical
Likes Fakhrul Islam, bhobba, dextercioby and 7 others
I also recommend that book ( and his other books ) but you need to keep a close eye on the typos. If you follow any derivations in the book , you should find the typos easy to spot
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Fakhrul Islam, bhobba, murshid_islam and 2 others
murshid_islam said:
TL;DR Summary: Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" a good book for a beginner for self-studying?

I'm a layman with background in high school physics and undergrad calculus. Is "Quantum Mechanics Demystified" by David McMahon a good book for self-studying and learning quantum mechanics?
QM should not be left to self-study in my opinion. I recommend taking a course at a local college instead. I say that only based on my own experience taking QM in college and the fact that you then have an expert to ask questions of.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...
Back
Top