Music Is quantum physics easier than playing this guitar piece?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the difficulty of playing a guitar piece to understanding quantum physics, highlighting that such comparisons are inherently subjective. Participants note that individuals possess varying skills, with some excelling in musical performance while others are better at grasping mathematical concepts. The term "easier" is challenged, as motivation plays a significant role in learning; many would prefer mastering a guitar piece over delving into quantum physics. The conversation also touches on the physical and mental demands of playing guitar, likening it to athletic performance, and suggests that the complexity of quantum physics can vary based on the depth of study. Overall, the consensus leans towards quantum mechanics being more challenging, especially when considering advanced concepts.

Is quantum physics easier than playing this guitar piece?

  • Yes

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • No

    Votes: 1 50.0%
  • They are equally difficult

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
jack action
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
9,713
The internet has a question for the PF members who are also musicians. Is quantum physics easier than playing this guitar piece?

 
Science news on Phys.org
The key is to understanding the relationship between the musical performance and the resulting recording.

|<musical performance>| ## \rightarrow ## ( 1|musical recording⟩ )
 
Impossible to compare. Across the population different people are going to naturally have better fine motor skills and melodic sense while others have better mathematical and causality sense.

Also easier is a misnomer. I'd be more motivated to learn this piece than to learn quantum physics. Also how deep into quantum physics do we have to go? I passed my intro to qm class during my bachelor's degree but I'm not research grade.
 
It’s not that difficult of a guitar piece, definitely a Newtonian mechanics level.

The playing is an athletic endeavor- mechanics of technique, muscle memory, visual and aural memory. Might as well ask whether being a starting forward in the NBA is more difficult than quantum mechanics - certainly there are fewer NBA players than people competent in QM.

Now this is a difficult guitar piece

 
  • Like
Likes jack action
It's a bit of a weird comparison. I can play a little bit so I'll say QM is harder. Only 9 years on the site so there is still time.
 
  • Like
Likes jack action
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Back
Top