donglepuss
- 17
- 4
i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
1/(1-0.999...)
The discussion revolves around the concept of Rayo's number and its status as potentially the largest finite number. Participants explore various perspectives on large numbers, including Graham's number and the implications of defining and comparing such quantities.
Participants express differing views on the validity and implications of various large numbers, with no consensus reached on whether Rayo's number is indeed the largest finite number. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.
Some arguments rely on the definitions of numbers and the nature of infinity, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion includes playful and serious contributions, reflecting a range of interpretations and assumptions about large numbers.
fresh_42 said:I'll skip to the end: Ben Gurion!
http://www.ephraimkishon.de/en/my_favorite_stories.htm
1/(1-0.999...) +1donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
Bogus, since 9-bar is exactly 1 so you are dividing by zero. Why not just say infinity, since that's what you wrote?donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
Two philosophers getting drunk in a bar and one asks the other.donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
Here is the man himself explaining where it came from.DaveC426913 said:1/(1-0.999...) +1
The problem is that it is s trivial game if all you have to do is make up a number.
That's why I'm a fan of Grahams Number, which was (for a time) the largest number ever used in a math paper.
Its so large that it cannot be written out in the volume of the observable universe. In fact, the number that represents the number of digits in Grahams number is so large, it cannot be written out in the volume of the known universe.
Is this the biggest? Rayo's number?donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)