Is Ruby Still Relevant in the World of Programming?

  • Thread starter Thread starter G037H3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ruby
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
G037H3
Messages
280
Reaction score
2
Any other Ruby developers? :)

Pure Ruby or RoR, I don't care. Anyone else love this language? :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I finally get around to learning Python and you go and swap focus. Not impressed.
 


JaredJames said:
I finally get around to learning Python and you go and swap focus. Not impressed.

Haha! It's too inflexible for me. I really prefer TMTOWTDI. I'm too right-brained I guess :wink:
 


G037H3 said:
Pure Ruby or RoR, I don't care. Anyone else love this language? :D
I do! I actually learned to program in it before learning Python...

Having said that, I actually do more Python programming than Ruby although I still do a fair bit of Ruby programming. The problem is that while I prefer the Ruby syntax, Python still has a more mature implementation. For example, Python 3.0 has done away with lists as default containers and have moved onto generators. After all, you rarely actually need the list and, in the rare times that you do, you can make one out of your generator! Ruby is still using lists, for now...

Also, and this is the real kicker for me, there exists a good visual debugger for Python called WinPDB. Sadly, there's nothing like it for Ruby...
 


It was amongst the first programming languages I've learned. I still use it for occasional tinkering but it's far too slow for me to love, that and I very much dislike duck-typed programming.