Is Sin 1° Algebraic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter happyg1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the algebraic nature of sin(1°) and whether it can be proven to satisfy a polynomial equation. Participants explore the definitions of algebraic numbers and the implications of trigonometric identities in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods to demonstrate that sin(1°) is algebraic, including the use of polynomial expressions and trigonometric identities. There are questions about the minimal polynomial and whether the polynomial needs to be the smallest one that sin(1°) satisfies.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with several participants providing insights and suggestions on how to approach the problem. Some express uncertainty about the requirements for proving that sin(1°) is algebraic, while others emphasize the need for a polynomial with integer coefficients.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the definitions of algebraic and transcendental numbers, as well as the implications of rational multiples of pi in relation to the problem. Participants also express varying levels of confidence in their understanding and approach to the problem.

happyg1
Messages
304
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that sin 1 (degree) is algebraic.

Homework Equations



"The element a \in K is said to be algebraic of degree n over F(a field) if it satisfies a nonzero polynomial over F of degree n but no nonzero polynomial of lower degree."

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought it might work to try this formula:
(cos x + i sin x)^n=cos nx + i sin nx
then let x=sin 1
with the identity cos^2 x +sin^2 x =1
I raised this to the 90th power because then cos disappears:
(\sqrt{1-x^2} + ix)^{90} = sin 90=1

then I put this into my TI-89 because it looks scary...and IT IS SCARY.
The coefficients all are integers (VERY LARGE INTEGERS).
The part that I don't know about is if it's the smallest nonzero polynomial that sin 1 degree satisfies and does anyboby know a neater way to go about finding this ploynomial? As it is, I can't even tell if eisenstein's criterion would apply. I'd have to go through a 90th degree polynomial and try to find a prime that would work. The coefficients look like this:
-7471375560,706252528630,-41604694413840...and there are some twice that size.
Any input would be appreciated.
CC
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If all you have to do is show its algebraic, you just need to show it satisfies some polynomial. It might not be the smallest polynomial it satisfies, but it will have this minimal polynomial as a factor.
 
I'm not sure if your allowed to use this fact, but For any value, other than zero, that is not a rational multiply of pi, the sine, cosine, or tan of that value is transcendental and therefore algebraic. What your asking for is pi * 1/180, so is algebraic.
 
Gib Z said:
I'm not sure if your allowed to use this fact, but For any value, other than zero, that is not a rational multiply of pi, the sine, cosine, or tan of that value is transcendental and therefore algebraic. What your asking for is pi * 1/180, so is algebraic.

Actually algebraic and transcendental are totally disjoint notions. "Transcendental" means "non algebraic".

And one more thing: 1/180 is a rational multiple (of "pi").
 
Typo make Gib Z go angry!

Transcendental and therefore NOT algebraic. 1 degree is a rational multiple of pi, and therefore THE SINE of it is algebraic.
 
If what you meant to say was
For any value, other than zero, that is not a rational multiply of pi, the sine, cosine, or tan of that value is transcendental and therefore NOT algebraic. What your asking for is pi * 1/180, so is algebraic.
That does not follow. Your statement is that if x is NOT a rational multiple of pi then sine, cosine, or tan of that value is NOT algebraic. If this is not an "if and only if" statement, it says nothing whatsoever about what happens when x IS a rational multiple of pi.

Here's my thought, although I have not worked it out. sin(30)= 1/2. You should be able to use trig identities to reduce that to a 30th degree polynomial in sin(1).
 
dextercioby said:
And one more thing: 1/180 is a rational multiple (of "pi").

Hmm..so there exists a rational number R so that R*"pi"=1/180?
Fascinating.
 
No no I am not saying pi/180 is rational, I am saying the multiple, 1/180, is rational.

Come on guys u know what i mean >.<"
 
I know, but dexter is saying that 1/180 is a rational multiple of pi. :smile:
 
  • #10
happyg1 said:
then I put this into my TI-89 because it looks scary...and IT IS SCARY.
The coefficients all are integers (VERY LARGE INTEGERS).
The part that I don't know about is if it's the smallest nonzero polynomial that sin 1 degree satisfies and does anyboby know a neater way to go about finding this ploynomial?

Why are you using a calculator, and why do you need to find the minimal polynomial? (Those questions are supposed to make you think about why you're doing what you're doing.)
 
  • #11
Why not find the exact value of sin 1degree? Then you can model a polynomial around that value.
 
  • #12
Because that won't work. That is why. Unless you have some particularly clever way in mind to evaluate sin(1) exactly that isn't just 'use trig formulae', and which would give the answer anyway, that is.

The question just asks to show sin(1) is algebraic. That is easy. Sin(30) is algebraic, and can be written as an integral polynomial expression in sin(1). C'est tout.
 
  • #13
Hey,
I *thought* I had have the minimal polynomial, going by the definition that I wrote up there. My prof. agrees that it just has to be SOME polynomial. He also says that if I want to use the "sin 30 is algebriac, so then sin 1 is algebraic" I have to prove that that sin 30 is algebraic and be rigouous in my work. So I guess I need an integral polynomial for sin 30, then show that sin 1 can be written as an integral polynomial expression in sin 1. I think I need the actual polynomial.
Any thoughts?
CC
 
  • #14
Don't be silly. sin(30)=1/2.
 
  • #15
Look. If you want an explicit polynomial, let x=exp(i*(1 degree)). Then x^180=(-1). Expand x in sin(1) and cos(1) using the binomial theorem. Ignore the imaginary parts, they'll cancel.
 
  • #16
happyg1 said:
Hey,
I *thought* I had have the minimal polynomial, going by the definition that I wrote up there. My prof. agrees that it just has to be SOME polynomial. He also says that if I want to use the "sin 30 is algebriac, so then sin 1 is algebraic" I have to prove that that sin 30 is algebraic and be rigouous in my work. So I guess I need an integral polynomial for sin 30, then show that sin 1 can be written as an integral polynomial expression in sin 1. I think I need the actual polynomial.
Any thoughts?
CC

I believe that is exactly what I said 7 posts back!
 
  • #17
Hi,
Halls, I read what you wrote and then went to my prof and asked him, because sometimes what he expects us to do differs from the info on the forum. I was just being careful. I really want to understand this stuff but it gives me a headache sometimes. I tend to go the long way because I easily get confused. I've been struggling with this homework problem for a while now, and I'm still fuzzy on EXACTLY what I need to write down to show that this thing is algebraic. Is it just a plynomial that sin 1 satisfies? Then I can say "Since sin 1 is a root of this polynomial and the coefficients are all integers, sin 1 is an algrbraic number"?...and put it to bed?
I have a giant polynomial that works. I don't know if I should just print it out and give him that or if I should attempt to get another polynomial that's nicer. My head hurts.
CC
 
  • #18
happyg1 said:
Is it just a INTEGER COEFFICIENT polynomial that sin 1 satisfies? Then I can say "Since sin 1 is a root of this polynomial and the coefficients are all integers, sin 1 is an algrbraic number"?

I inserted the words ''integer" and "coefficient" into the quote. The answer is: yes, that is what the definition of algebraic is.

You can either produce one explicilty (though that would be silly) or you can show one exists (this is easy).
 
  • #19
I would still urge you to think hard about the expression x^180 where x=exp(i*(1 degree)). It's already practically explicit. I don't think it's necessary to actually compute the coefficients - just give a recipe for getting them.
 
  • #20
Show that sin 1 satisfies a polynomial with integer coefficient, or eqivalently, rational coefficient.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K