Is Space Fabric Real or Just a Theoretical Construct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathJakob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether space can be considered materialistic or if it exists purely as a theoretical construct. Participants explore concepts from classical physics, general relativity, and quantum mechanics, noting that "empty" space is never truly empty and is filled with virtual particles and cosmic radiation. The analogy of space as a "fabric" is debated, with some arguing it confuses rather than clarifies the nature of gravity and curvature. It is concluded that while space exhibits properties like curvature, it does not necessarily imply it is a material substance. The conversation highlights the philosophical implications of space's nature, suggesting that current scientific consensus leans towards space being non-materialistic.
  • #31
WannabeNewton said:
That's the Newtonian view of space. General relativity doesn't work that way; space isn't just a backdrop on which physics takes place.

I really really wish you hadnt said that. I now have to take my undertanding back to the drawing board so I hope you arent mistaken!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K