Is \sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5} an Algebraic Number?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheOogy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around whether the expression \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) qualifies as an algebraic number. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and reasoning related to algebraic numbers, polynomial equations, and properties of algebraic operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) is an algebraic number and mentions the difficulty in finding a polynomial with rational coefficients that has this expression as a root.
  • Another participant suggests that if \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) were algebraic, its powers would span a finite dimensional vector space over \(\mathbb{Q}\).
  • A participant proposes defining \(x\) as \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) and explores the implications of calculating \(x^2\) and the resulting polynomial equation.
  • One participant asserts that \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) is indeed algebraic, providing a polynomial equation \(x^4 - 14x^2 + 9 = 0\) that it satisfies.
  • Another participant acknowledges a mistake in their earlier calculation regarding the polynomial and corrects it, reaffirming that \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\) satisfies the corrected polynomial equation.
  • Discussion includes a mention of the additive properties of algebraic numbers and whether they form a group under addition.
  • Several participants introduce related questions about other expressions, such as \(e+\pi\), and their potential transcendental nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the algebraic nature of \(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}\), with some asserting it is algebraic based on polynomial equations, while others question the validity of those equations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of algebraic numbers and their properties.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the polynomial equations presented, as well as the implications of algebraic operations on algebraic numbers.

TheOogy
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
is \sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5} an algebraic number?
i used 2 and 5 arbitrarily, try any integers (as long as they are not the same integer, in which case it is algebraic)
I tried finding a polynomial with rational coefficients that zeros at this value, but haven't found any.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it was, its powers would span a finite dimensional vector space over Q.
 
Last edited:
thanks matt grime!
 
Yes, of course it is. If x= \sqrt{2}+ \sqrt{5} then x- \sqrt{2}= \sqrt{5} and (x- \sqrt{2})^2= x^2- 2\sqrt{2}x+ 2= 5. Then x^2- 3= 2\sqrt{2}x so (x^2- 3)^2= x^4- 6x^2+ 9= 8. \sqrt{2}+ \sqrt{5} satisfies the polynomial equation x^4- 6x^2+ 1= 0 and so is algebraic.
 
HallsofIvy,
<br /> (\sqrt{5}+\sqrt{2})^4-6(\sqrt{5}+\sqrt{2})^2+1 = 98.596<br />


i got a different result, for any \sqrt{a}, \sqrt{b}
just use (\sqrt{a}+ \sqrt{b})*(\sqrt{a}- \sqrt{b})*(-\sqrt{a}+ \sqrt{b})*(-\sqrt{a}- \sqrt{b}) and expand
i haven't read the whole article, just the start and deducted this (without proof) by factoring the polynomial they gave for 2 and 3
 
Thanks for the correction. Here's my mistake:
instead of (x^2- 3)^2= x^4- 6x^2+ 9= 8 is should have
(x^2- 3)^2= x^4- 6x^2+ 9= 8x^2. I dropped the "x" in "2\sqrt{2}x" when I squared.

With that correction, we get x^4- 14x^2+ 9= 0 and this time I checked, with a calculator, that \sqrt{2}+ \sqrt{5} satisfies that equation.

Since \sqrt{2}+ \sqrt{5} satisfies x^4- 14x^2+ 9= 0, it is algebraic.
 
If you can prove that the algebraic numbers form a group additively, then you are done.
 
jason, what do you mean "form a group additively"? I don't get it, do you mean some sort of commutative property? Although I doubt it..
 
  • #10
It means if you add or subtract algebraic numbers from each other, you get an algebraic number.
 
  • #11
Thats a great question. I was working on a similar question, whether e+pi was transcendental.
 
  • #12
camilus said:
Thats a great question. I was working on a similar question, whether e+pi was transcendental.

Hah! good luck.
 
  • #13
camilus said:
jason, what do you mean "form a group additively"? I don't get it, do you mean some sort of commutative property? Although I doubt it..

I never said anything about commutativity (even though in this case there is).
 
  • #14
camilus said:
Thats a great question. I was working on a similar question, whether e+pi was transcendental.

Haha, yeah like CRGreathouse said, good luck.

This question is way beyond the calibre of question compared to the one in the OP.
 
  • #15
The algebraic numbers form a field even, but that's a little tricky to prove (specifically if a and b are algebraic numbers, then a*b is too)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
820
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K