Is superlinear convergence always better than linear convergence?

  • Thread starter Thread starter haya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary
Superlinear convergence is generally considered faster than linear convergence, but the two are not directly interchangeable. A sequence that is linearly convergent can also be superlinearly convergent, but there are instances where a sequence is one without being the other. The discussion emphasizes the need to understand the definitions and implications of both convergence types. It highlights that while superlinear convergence implies a certain speed, it does not automatically mean it is always the better option. Understanding the nuances of these convergence types is crucial for accurate mathematical analysis.
haya
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://im2.gulfup.com/2011-04-01/1301686351321.gif

Homework Equations



superlinearly convergence

The Attempt at a Solution



[PLAIN]http://im2.gulfup.com/2011-04-01/1301686616101.gif

this is what i know about it, kindly help me
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should look up the definition of a linearly convergent sequence, and then see if one implies the other. P.ex., if a sequence is linearly convergent, then it is also superlinearly convergent (which would be b in your answers). Or, there are sequences which are linearly convergent, but not superlinearly convergent, vice versa, and some which are both (that would be c). And so on. Of course, only one is right.
 
Ok, so assume you have a superlinearly converging sequence {p_n}. Then {c_n} is a zero sequence, so it converges to zero. So, especially (from some n on), it must be smaller than a constant M, right? What does that imply for your original sequence {p_n} in terms of linear convergence?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K