MHB Is Tan(cos2x) equal to tan(2 cos^-1(x))?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elissa89
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that 2 cos^-1(x) is not equal to cos(2x), emphasizing that cos^-1(x) represents an angle θ where cos(θ) = x. To find tan(2 cos^-1(x)), the double angle formula for tangent is applied, along with the identity for tan(θ) derived from sin(θ) and cos(θ). Participants suggest substituting tan(θ) with its expression in terms of x and simplifying the resulting equation. The final expression for tan(2 cos^-1(x)) is derived as 2x√(1-x^2)/(2x^2-1). Understanding the distinction between cos^-1(x) and cos(2x) is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
tan(2 cos^-1(x))

I'm pretty sure 2 cos^-1(x) is the same as cos2x, the doubles formula, but from there I'm completely lost.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Elissa89 said:
tan(2 cos^-1(x))

I'm pretty sure 2 cos^-1(x) is the same as cos2x, the doubles formula, but from there I'm completely lost.

$2\cos^{-1}(x) \ne \cos(2x)$

$\cos^{-1}(x)$ is an angle (call it $\theta$) such $\cos{\theta} = x$

$\tan(2\theta) = \dfrac{2\tan{\theta}}{1-\tan^2{\theta}}$

$\cos{\theta} = x \implies \sin{\theta} = \sqrt{1-x^2} \implies \tan{\theta} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x}$

substitute the above expression for $\tan{\theta}$ in the double angle formula for tangent and simplify the algebra.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
skeeter said:
$2\cos^{-1}(x) \ne \cos(2x)$

$\cos^{-1}(x)$ is an angle (call it $\theta$) such $\cos{\theta} = x$

$\tan(2\theta) = \dfrac{2\tan{\theta}}{1-\tan^2{\theta}}$

$\cos{\theta} = x \implies \sin{\theta} = \sqrt{1-x^2} \implies \tan{\theta} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{x}$

substitute the above expression for $\tan{\theta}$ in the double angle formula for tangent and simplify the algebra.

I'm not sure I understand
 
Elissa89 said:
I'm not sure I understand
What, specifically, don't you understand? We can help you better if we know this.

-Dan
 
We are having to guess at what the OP is supposed to accomplish. Is it calculating a value for the expression given a value for x or, as we are guessing, is it to find a purely algebraic expression for the given trigonometric expression; or even something else.
 
It appears that you do not understand what "cos^{-1}(x)" means! It is the inverse function to cos(x) (limited to x= 0 to \pi so that it is one-to-one). cos^{-1}(1)= 0 because cos(0)= 1. cos^{-1}(0)= \pi/2 because cos(\pi/2)= 0, etc.

The basic fact you need to use here is that cos(cos^{-1}(x))= x so you should try to change that "tan(2..)" to "cos(..)". I would start by using the identity tan(2x)= \frac{2 tan(x)}{1- tan^2(x)}. Now use the fact that tan(x)= \frac{sin(x)}{cos(x)} and then that sin(x)= \sqrt{1- cos^2(x)}: tan(2x)= \frac{2 tan(x)}{1- tan^2(x)}= \frac{2\frac{\sqrt{1- cos^2(x)}}{cos(x)}}{1- \frac{1- cos^2(x)}{cos^2(x)}}.

Replacing each "x" with cos^{-1}(x) changes each "cos(x)" to "x" so that
tan(2cos^{-1}(x))= \frac{2\frac{\sqrt{1- x^2}}{x}}{1- \frac{1- x^2}{x^2}}= \frac{2x\sqrt{1- x^2}}{2x^2- 1}.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top