Is the Closure of a Totally Bounded Set Also Totally Bounded?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sazanda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the closure of a totally bounded set in the complex numbers, denoted as S(closure), is compact if and only if S is precompact. The participants clarify that precompactness is equivalent to total boundedness, emphasizing the use of the Heine-Borel theorem. The proof strategy involves demonstrating that for every ε>0, S can be covered by finitely many discs of radius ε, which leads to the conclusion that S(closure) is also totally bounded.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of precompactness and total boundedness in metric spaces.
  • Familiarity with the Heine-Borel theorem in the context of complex numbers.
  • Knowledge of limit points and their properties in topology.
  • Basic definitions of open covers and discs in metric spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Heine-Borel theorem and its implications for compactness in metric spaces.
  • Explore the definitions and properties of totally bounded sets in depth.
  • Learn about limit points and their role in the closure of sets.
  • Investigate examples of precompact sets in \mathbb{C} to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology and analysis, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts of compactness and boundedness in metric spaces.

sazanda
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let S be a subset of C. Prove that S is precompact if and only
if S(closure) is compact.

Homework Equations



I have already showed if S(closure) compact, then S is precompact
how can I show if S is precompact, then S(closure) is compact?

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your definition ofS being precompact? The one I knew is that the closure of S is compact.
 
Bacle said:
What is your definition ofS being precompact? The one I knew is that the closure of S is compact.

I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.
 
Definition:
A set S is precompact if every ε>0 then S can be covered by finitely many discs of radius ε .
 
micromass said:
I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.

We didn't cover totally boundedness. I think we should use definition of precompactess.
 
Sazanda:
The definition you gave is the same as that of totally-bounded. I mean, totally.
 
totally bounded

micromass said:
I think the OP means totally bounded. I've seen this terminology used before...

Anyway, you are working in \mathbb{C}. So try to prove that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded. Then use Heine-Borel.

how Can I show that the closure of a totally bounded set is (totally) bounded?

solution Tried:

Assume S is totally bounded. then for very ε>0 there are finitely many discs (O=Union of finitely many discs) that covers S let x be a limit points of S that is in S closure. but not in S.
hence x is in O (how can I show this?)
So x is in O for all x in S closure.
Hence S closure is totally bounded.

Am I on the right track?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K