Is the Convergence of This Series Equal to 1/4?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter uman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Series
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the series \(\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{n}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}\) and whether it equals \(1/4\). Participants explore various methods for proving this, including partial fraction decomposition and integral approximations, while expressing uncertainty and seeking clarification on certain mathematical concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in proving the convergence of the series and mentions attempting partial fractions without success.
  • Another participant asks for the results of the partial fraction decomposition, indicating interest in the method.
  • A participant provides a decomposition of the series but does not clarify how it leads to the conclusion of convergence.
  • One participant introduces a formula related to Newton's summation but does not provide a source, leading to questions from others about its validity.
  • Another participant challenges the existence of the proposed formula, stating that while integrals can approximate sums, they are not generally equal.
  • There is a request for more details regarding the formula and its application to the series.
  • Participants reiterate the similarity of the decomposed terms, suggesting a potential connection to the original series.
  • One participant emphasizes the distinction between sums and integrals, using an example to illustrate the complexity of proving convergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of the proposed formula or the method for proving the series converges to \(1/4\). There are competing views on the relationship between sums and integrals, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the applicability of certain mathematical techniques, such as partial fraction decomposition and integral approximations, without resolving the limitations or assumptions involved.

uman
Messages
348
Reaction score
1
Hi all. I am stuck on this problem:

Prove that [tex]\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{n}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}=1/4[/tex].

I am totally stuck on this! I tried breaking it up into partial fractions, which worked on some other problems in this section because it showed how to express them as telescoping series, but in this case that technique provided no new insight. I'm stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you get when you use partial fraction decomposition?
 
[tex]\frac{n}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}=-\frac{1}{2(x+1)} + \frac{2}{x+2} - \frac{3}{2(x+3)}[/tex]
 
uman, do you know calculus. to be precise Newton's summation formula? here it is for you.

summation of n/(C + n) where n varies from 0 to Inf is same as

Definite integral of 1 / ( 1 + C.x) from 0 to 1 = 1/C * ln (1+x)

use this formula after you decompose the function into smaller units as you have done.
 
Meaw do you have any links to this formula? I can't find anything on google about it, but I've been at a loss to figure this one out too XD
 
Eh meaw could you give a few more details please?
 
There is no such formula. You can approximate a sum by such an integral or use it to determine whether the sum converges or not, but the integral is, in general, NOT equal to the integral.
 
Okay... anyone have any more ideas for solving it?
 
uman said:
[tex]\frac{n}{(n+1)(n+2)(n+3)}=-\frac{1}{2(x+1)} + \frac{2}{x+2} - \frac{3}{2(x+3)}[/tex]
Those terms look awfully similar...
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
There is no such formula. You can approximate a sum by such an integral or use it to determine whether the sum converges or not, but the integral is, in general, NOT equal to the integral.
That's a very important point that most people miss. The best example I can think of is,
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^2}[/tex]
Which turns out to be [itex]\pi^2/6[/itex]. But the corresponding integral is 1. Proving a is very very difficult, in general...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K