I Is the CPT-Symmetric Universe Theory the Key to Solving the Antimatter Mystery?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Quarker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory Universe
Quarker
Messages
103
Reaction score
10
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.08928.

This is a simple and elegant theory, but there are some things I don’t understand. Why would the anti-universe exist before the Big Bang? From the viewpoint of the anti-universe, isn’t our universe time-reversed?

Also, unless the total charge of all particles of the two universes is zero, this doesn’t solve the antimatter issue. For the charges to balance out, the two universes would have to be identical; for every particle in one universe, there would have to be an anti-particle in the other. Neil Turok has said that quantum uncertainty would lead to different universes.

If the two universes are identical, except for being mirror images of one another, do they interact in some way? Electromagnetism seems the likeliest candidate for that. An electromagnetic null wave making the jump to a time-reversed universe seems possible in such a theory, although detecting it might prove difficult.

The main attraction of this theory for me is the symmetry, and the non-zero possibility that such symmetry arises from the aesthetic choices of a creator. But as always, the evidence comes first.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Matter and anti-matter are linked by the CPT symmetry, the T of which stands for time. That is, the arrow of time* is reversed for anti-matter compared to normal matter. So from the point of origin, normal matter goes forward in time, while anti-matter goes backwards in time.

* Note: the quantum arrow of time doesn't actually have to be the same as the macroscopic one we observe. I believe this paper is proposing that they are the same.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top