I Is the current related to a path or to potential difference?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether current flow is dependent on a closed path or if a potential difference can exist without one. It is clarified that while a battery maintains a potential difference between its terminals, current flow requires a closed circuit. Touching the positive terminal of a battery without a connection to the negative terminal does not create a steady current, as the potential difference exists only between the battery's poles. Additionally, the conversation notes that both current flow and potential differences can exist independently in certain conditions, particularly in DC circuits. Ultimately, current requires a closed path for continuous flow, despite the presence of potential differences.
lukka98
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Is the current related to a path or to potential difference?
The question is very simple: Is the flow of charge, or current, related to a closed path or there will be a potential difference without closed path to allowing the flow?
I mean, If I have a battery that maintain 5V of potential difference through its terminal, I believe there is an amount of negative charge on the negative terminal and positive in the positive, and when I connect to a wire electron whithin conductor are simply shoved toward the positive terminal, and so on the chemical reaction recharged negative terminal and again.

But If I touch the positive poles of a battery, whit the negative not connected to nothing, and with feet on the ground without insulation, the current flow from Earth to the positive poles until they are at the same potential? Because there is a potential difference I think, for example in the fault protection, If the ground wire is required, there is a flow current from the positive to ground ( vacation flow) only until they are at the same potential? And then so then I am at the same potential of the thing I touch and there is no problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lukka98 said:
But If I touch the positive poles of a battery, whit the negative not connected to nothing, and with feet on the ground without insulation, the current flow from Earth to the positive poles until they are at the same potential? Because there is a potential difference I think
There is not. The potential difference is between the poles of the battery, not between Earth and positive pole. Touching that (or even: connecting a fat conducting wire to earth) does not cause a steady current.

##\ ##
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes lukka98 and vanhees71
lukka98 said:
Summary:: Is the current related to a path or to potential difference?

Is the flow of charge, or current, related to a closed path or there will be a potential difference without closed path to allowing the flow?
Are you considering only DC and low frequency or are you considering very high frequency circuits too.
 
Dale said:
Are you considering only DC and low frequency or are you considering very high frequency circuits too.
Only DC current, like battery.
 
lukka98 said:
Summary:: Is the current related to a path or to potential difference?

Is the flow of charge, or current, related to a closed path or there will be a potential difference without closed path to allowing the flow?
At DC this is not an either-or situation. Both are true. Current is related to a closed path. There are potential differences without closed paths.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'

Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
View full post »
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field (version 2)'

Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field (version 2)'

This argument is another version of my previous post. Imagine that we have two long vertical wires connected either side of a charged sphere. We connect the two wires to the charged sphere simultaneously so that it is discharged by equal and opposite currents. Using the Lorenz gauge ##\nabla\cdot\mathbf{A}+(1/c^2)\partial \phi/\partial t=0##, Maxwell's equations have the following retarded wave solutions in the scalar and vector potentials. Starting from Gauss's law $$\nabla \cdot...
View full post »

Similar threads

I DC current flows in a wire when two loops are brought close by?
Replies
14
Views
1K
I Potential difference between a battery's terminal and Earth ground
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
B Some Questions about Electric Current/Capacitors to help my understanding
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Found a circuit where current is zero across an ohmic device (dV>0)
Replies
11
Views
1K
I Explaining the magnetic (cable) paradox
Replies
5
Views
608
I Charging Capacitor with one terminal grounded
Replies
16
Views
3K
I How is Potential Difference Created in Electrolytes?
Replies
10
Views
1K
I Energy Flow From Battery to the Light Bulb
Replies
16
Views
4K
B Basic questions regarding theory of electrical capacitance
Replies
11
Views
1K
I Electric Potential -- Is my understanding correct?
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top