Is the Definite Integral of e^(i(u*cos(x)+v*sin(x)) Known?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The definite integral of the expression \(\int_0^{2\pi} e^{i(u\cos(x) + v\sin(x))} dx\) is known and is represented by a 0-order modified Bessel function. This integral arises in various contexts, particularly in mathematical physics and engineering. Users can verify this result using Wolfram Alpha by inputting the integral directly. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between complex exponentials and Bessel functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, specifically complex exponentials.
  • Familiarity with Bessel functions, particularly modified Bessel functions.
  • Knowledge of definite integrals and their applications in mathematical physics.
  • Experience with computational tools like Wolfram Alpha for integral evaluation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of modified Bessel functions.
  • Learn how to derive integrals involving complex exponentials.
  • Explore the relationship between Fourier transforms and Bessel functions.
  • Investigate the use of Wolfram Alpha for solving complex integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers who are working with integrals involving complex functions and those interested in the applications of Bessel functions in various scientific fields.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hello,
while attempting to solve a problem, I came up with the following integral:

[tex]\int_0^{2\pi}e^{i\left( u\cos(x)+v\sin(x) \right)}dx[/tex]

where u,v are two real constants.
I don't know how to solve this definite integral and I am wondering if this formula is already known, and if it pops up in other contexts.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks a lot!
It seems the definite integral of that expression is given by a 0-order 'modified Bessel function'. Interesting.

I trust the answer from that site but I am wondering now if it would be difficult to prove that result.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K