Is the dimension of two vector spaces the same if they have equal cardinality?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rhobymic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cardinality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Two vector spaces V and W can have equal cardinality |V|=|W| without having the same dimension, dim(V)≠dim(W). The dimension of a vector space is determined by the cardinality of its basis vectors, not the overall cardinality of the space. A bijection between V and W does not guarantee an isomorphic linear transformation, as demonstrated by Cantor's proof that R and R² have the same cardinality despite differing dimensions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of basis vectors in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of bijections and isomorphic transformations
  • Basic comprehension of cardinality in set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and their dimensions
  • Learn about bijections and isomorphic linear transformations in detail
  • Explore Cantor's theorem on cardinality and its implications
  • Investigate examples of vector spaces with equal cardinality but different dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of vector spaces and cardinality in set theory.

rhobymic
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question ...

If two vector spaces, say V and W, have equal cardinality |V|=|W| ... do they then have the same dimension? That is dim(V)=dim(W)?

I am struggling with making this call one way or the other. This is no area of expertise for me by any means so I know I am missing something important but here are my thoughts:

-> No it does not mean they have the same dim. Dimension is the value of the cardinality of the BASIS vectors of a vector space not the cardinality of the full vector space.


-> Yes it does because if |V|=|W| is true then there is a bijection between V and W and therefor an isomorphic linear transformation T between V and W. This would imply that T carries a basis from V into W and so V and W would have the same cardinality of basis vectors er go the same dimension...


I am still leaning towards "No" because I think the assumption that if V and W are bijective then there is an isomorphic linear transformation is probably not possible...

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rhobymic said:
This is not a homework question ...

If two vector spaces, say V and W, have equal cardinality |V|=|W| ... do they then have the same dimension? That is dim(V)=dim(W)?

I am struggling with making this call one way or the other. This is no area of expertise for me by any means so I know I am missing something important but here are my thoughts:

-> No it does not mean they have the same dim. Dimension is the value of the cardinality of the BASIS vectors of a vector space not the cardinality of the full vector space.

This is a nice observation, but it is not a proof. To answer the question as "no", you just need to come up with two vector spaces that have equal cardinality but not equal basis.

-> Yes it does because if |V|=|W| is true then there is a bijection between V and W and therefor an isomorphic linear transformation T between V and W. This would imply that T carries a basis from V into W and so V and W would have the same cardinality of basis vectors er go the same dimension...

I don't really see why an arbitrary bijection would be an isomorphism...
 
rhobymic said:
-> Yes it does because if |V|=|W| is true then there is a bijection between V and W and therefor an isomorphic linear transformation T between V and W. This would imply that T carries a basis from V into W and so V and W would have the same cardinality of basis vectors er go the same dimension...
Thanks for any help!
A bijection needs not be linear. In fact, Cantor proved that R and R2 have the same cardinality, and hence that all Rn (n>0) have the same cardinality. For a proof, see Theorem 2 here. (The proof is actually incomplete, since the author has forgotten the 0.99999...=1 problem. But it can be fixed.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K