Undergrad Is the Dirichlet integral a shortcut for solving this difficult integral?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on evaluating the integral ##\displaystyle \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{\cos x}{x^2+1} dx## using differentiation under the integral sign. The user defines ##I(t) = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{\cos tx}{x^2+1} dx## and explores the relationship between the integral and the Dirichlet integral. The conclusion emphasizes that the symmetry of the function allows for simplification, leading to the result that ##I(t) = I(-t)##, which confirms that the final answer is independent of the sign of ##t##. The discussion also raises the question of using calculus of residues as an alternative method for solving the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically improper integrals
  • Familiarity with differentiation under the integral sign
  • Knowledge of the Dirichlet integral and its properties
  • Basic concepts of symmetry in functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirichlet integral in detail
  • Learn about differentiation under the integral sign techniques
  • Explore calculus of residues and its applications in complex analysis
  • Investigate the implications of even functions in integral calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques and the application of symmetry in integral evaluation.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I have the integral ##\displaystyle \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{\cos x}{x^2+1} dx##. We are going to use differentiation under the integral sign, so we let ##\displaystyle I(t) = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{\cos tx}{x^2+1} dx##, and then, after manipulation, ##\displaystyle I'(t) = \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin tx}{x(x^2+1)} dx - \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} \frac{\sin tx}{x} dx##. My question lies in the rightmost integral. In a solution I've seen, the rightmost integral is linked to the Dirichlet integral: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_integral. And so ##\pi## is simply substituted for this expression. What I don't understand is how can it be linked to this known integral when there is that ##t## in the argument of ##\sin##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you not change variables? Let ##u=tx##, etc. etc.
 
kuruman said:
Can you not change variables? Let ##u=tx##, etc. etc.
Okay, I see how that could work... But I don't know the sign of t, right? As such I can't tell whether the upper bound on the integral goes to ##+ \infty## or ##- \infty##
 
The final answer should not depend on the sign of ##t## because ##I(t)=I(-t)##. You have an even function in ##x## and ##t##. That helps you to link to the Dirchlet integral by putting a ##2## up front and taking the limits from zero to infinity.
 
Is there a reason for why you don't deal with the original integral via calculus of residues?
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K