I Is the Ecliptic Plane the Same as the Apparent Path of the Sun?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter KurtLudwig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ecliptic
AI Thread Summary
The ecliptic plane is defined as the path of the Earth around the Sun, with a very flat orientation, as evidenced by Jupiter's slight deviation of only 0.5 degrees. The ecliptic also refers to the apparent path of the Sun over the course of a year. Both concepts describe the same motion but from different reference frames: from the Sun's perspective, the Earth is moving, while from Earth's perspective, the Sun appears to move. Ultimately, both descriptions relate to the same plane of motion. Understanding this duality clarifies the relationship between the ecliptic plane and the apparent solar path.
KurtLudwig
Gold Member
Messages
146
Reaction score
31
TL;DR Summary
Does beta, the angle to the ecliptic plane, of distant stars change? If it does it is probably very little over a long period of time.
Please correct my statements: By definition, the ecliptic plane is the path of the Earth around our Sun. Beta of Earth is 0.0000.
The ecliptic is very flat since Jupiter is only 0.5 degrees off the ecliptic.
From Wikipedia: " The ecliptic is actually the apparent path of the Sun throughout the course of a year." Is that the same as the ecliptic plane is the path of the Earth around our Sun?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
KurtLudwig said:
From Wikipedia: " The ecliptic is actually the apparent path of the Sun throughout the course of a year." Is that the same as the ecliptic plane is the path of the Earth around our Sun?
Yes. It's just a matter of choosing your reference frame - from the Sun it appears that the Earth is moving, from Earth it's the Sun. But it's the same motion, in the same plane.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top