I Is the F-test Calculation Different for Longitudinal Data in Linear Regression?

AI Thread Summary
Using a standard F-test for longitudinal data in linear regression typically requires modifications due to the nature of the data. Longitudinal data involves repeated measurements over time, which can violate the assumptions of traditional linear regression. In the context of random effects and fixed effects models, the calculation of the F-test may differ from that of cross-sectional data. It is essential to account for the correlation of observations within subjects when interpreting the F-test results. Therefore, specific adjustments or alternative methods may be necessary for accurate analysis in longitudinal studies.
monsmatglad
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Can i Use a standard F-test on longitudinal data for a linear multiple regression?

Mons
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to do, exactly? Generally you wouldn't use linear regression for longitudinal data without some modifications.
 
I am studying companies over 7 years with 4 independent variables. I am using both random effects model and fixed effects model. The regression results include an F-test for the coefficients of the independent variables. But when I am to describe how the F-test is calculated, is it different from a situation where all data is collected from a single "moment"?

Mons
 

Thread 'Value of intuitionistic logic'

I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
View full post »

Thread 'Formal derivation of statement from Peano Arithmetic system'

I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Linear regression, feature scaling, and regression coefficients
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Coefficient sign flip in linear regression with correlated predictors
Replies
13
Views
4K
A "Population-averaged"regression on panel data using Stata
Replies
1
Views
2K
I What are the commonly used estimators in regression models?
Replies
23
Views
4K
I What is Nonlinear Least Squares in Regression Analysis?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Linear regression and random variables
Replies
30
Views
4K
I What Are the Key Differences Between OLS and GLM Models in Statistical Analysis?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Expected coefficient change from simple to multiple linear regression
Replies
4
Views
2K
I How do I find the standardized coefficients?
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Can Alternative Least Squares Methods Be Used in Linear Regression?
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top