Is the following correct? (concerns sets and convergence)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RVP91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Sets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of sets, convergence, and sequences in the context of real analysis, particularly focusing on the intersection of sets and the behavior of sequences within those sets. Participants explore whether certain sequences belong to specified sets and the implications of convergence in relation to closed sets.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines sets A and B in R² and claims their intersection is empty, questioning if a specific sequence converges to a point in A.
  • Another participant challenges the claim that the sequence is in A, arguing that most values of the sequence do not belong to A.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of sequences in relation to closed sets, with some participants suggesting that a sequence can converge to a point outside of a closed set.
  • A later post introduces the idea of non-empty closed sets A and B that are disjoint, questioning if sequences from these sets can converge to a point where their distance approaches zero.
  • One participant provides an example of two sets with a distance of zero and asks for suitable sequences within those sets.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the definition of distance between sets and how it relates to the convergence of sequences.
  • Participants discuss the mathematical definition of distance between sets and the implications for the sequences being considered.
  • There is a suggestion that specific sequences could work to demonstrate convergence, with one participant affirming the validity of a proposed sequence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the membership of certain sequences in the defined sets, and there is no consensus on the broader implications of convergence in relation to closed sets. The discussion remains unresolved on some points, particularly regarding the nature of sequences and their convergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the definitions of closed sets and distance between sets, but there are unresolved aspects regarding the conditions under which sequences can converge to points outside of those sets. The discussion also highlights potential confusion around the representation of sequences in two dimensions.

RVP91
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Let A = {(x,y) in R^2 | x^2 + y^2 <= 81}
Let B = {((x,y) in R^2 | (x-10)^2 + (y-10)^2 <= 1}

then here "A intersection B" is the empty set.
Then let x_n be the sequence (0,10-(2/n)) which is a sequence in A and y_n be the sequence (10/n,10) which is a sequence in B.
would |x_n - y_n| tend to 0 in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think xn is a sequence in A? It is not.
 
Is it not? Isn't a sequence in A that converges to a point in A compliment?
 
A sequence in A is a sequence all of whose values are in A. Almost all of the values of xn are not in A.
 
RVP91 said:
Is it not? Isn't a sequence in A that converges to a point in A compliment?

A is a disk with radius 9. The sequence [itex]x_n[/itex] converges to (0,10). So the sequence is not in A.
 
But can't a sequence x_n [itex]\subseteq[/itex] S converge to a point in S compliment?
 
RVP91 said:
But can't a sequence x_n [itex]\subseteq[/itex] S converge to a point in S compliment?

Not if S is closed, no.
 
Oh right I see. Thank you.

Can there exist a pair of non-empty closed sets A,B [itex]\subseteq[/itex] R^2 with A [itex]\cap[/itex] B equals the empty set with a pair of sequences x_n [itex]\subseteq[/itex] A and y_n [itex]\subseteq[/itex] B such that ||x_n - y_n|| -> 0.

I was trying to find a specific example and hence my original thought was my first attempt.
 
Yes, such a thing exists. Take

[tex]A=\{(x,0)~\vert~x\in \mathbb{R}\}[/tex]

and

[tex]B=\{(x,1/x)~\vert~x\in \mathbb{R}\}[/tex]

(Note the distance between these two sets is 0). Can you find suitable sequences in these sets?
 
  • #10
Could you explain why the distance between the two sets is 0 please. I thought it was because d|x-y| = (x,0) - (x,1/x) = (0, -1/x) but wasn't sure how this means the distance is 0.

Also I'm finding it hard to grasp the concept of sequences in 2 dimension in the sense of how to represent them but my guess would be,
x_n = (3n, 0) and y_n = (3n, 1/3n) ?
 
  • #11
The distance between two sets is usually defined as the greater lower bound of the set of distances between 2 points in the sets. In symbols:
[tex] d(A,B) = \inf \{d(a,b) : a \in A, b \in B\} \, .[/tex]
Take a look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance#Distances_between_sets_and_between_a_point_and_a_set

So you were right that [itex]d(a,b) = |a-b| = |(x,0) - (x, 1/x)| = |(0,-1/x)| = 1/|x|[/itex]. But now you need to find the greatest lower bound of the set [itex]\{d(a,b) : a \in A, b \in B\}[/itex]. Do you see why it will be zero?
 
  • #12
Is it because as x gets smaller and tends to -infinity but you take the modulus and so u get limn-> infinity 1/x = 0?

Also were my choices of sequences okay? That is the main issue I am stuck with? I need x_n in A and y_n in B such that ||x_n - y_n|| tends to 0.
I think x_n=(3n,0) and y_n=(3n/1/3n) would work right?
 
  • #13
Yes, that choice of sequence is a good one!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K