Is the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect an emergent property?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect (FQHE) and whether it qualifies as an emergent property. Participants explore definitions of emergent properties, particularly distinguishing between strong and weak emergence, and consider the implications for understanding FQHE within the framework of quantum many-body theory.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that true emergent properties, defined as behaviors that cannot be reduced to fundamental physical laws, do not exist.
  • Others propose that emergent properties can be understood as those for which equations exist, but the derivation from fundamental laws is not yet understood.
  • A distinction is made between strong emergence (which cannot be reduced to fundamental laws in principle) and weak emergence (which cannot easily be reduced in practice), with FQHE being characterized as weakly emergent.
  • Participants mention that quantum many-body theory includes many emergent properties, often described through collective excitations or quasi-particles, which may not correspond to elementary particles.
  • There is a suggestion that while many phenomena in condensed-matter physics are not fully explainable from first principles, they do not necessarily indicate strong emergence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether FQHE is a true emergent property, with multiple competing definitions and interpretations of emergence being presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the ambiguity in definitions of emergent properties and the challenges in applying these concepts to specific phenomena like the FQHE. There are unresolved questions regarding the nature of emergence and its implications for understanding complex systems.

Cato
Messages
56
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
I have heard that the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is a true emergent property. I have never believed that emergent properties exist. Is this an example of one?
I do not think that true emergent properties -- as defined by behavior of matter that cannot be reduced to fundamental physical law -- exist. Yet I have been told that the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is an example of an emergent property. What is the consensus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cato said:
true emergent properties -- as defined by behavior of matter that cannot be reduced to fundamental physical law
This is not the common definition of "emergent properties" in physics. I think most physicists would say that "emergent properties" are properties that we have equations for, but we do not know how to derive those equations from the equations describing the fundamental laws. That in no way means such properties are not governed by the fundamental laws. It just means we don't understand how (yet).

Cato said:
I have been told that the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is an example of an emergent property.
Where? And was whoever told you using the same definition of "emergent property" that you are using? Or were they using a definition more like the one I gave above?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Demystifier
Cato said:
TL;DR Summary: I have heard that the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is a true emergent property. I have never believed that emergent properties exist. Is this an example of one?

I do not think that true emergent properties -- as defined by behavior of matter that cannot be reduced to fundamental physical law -- exist.
One should distinguish between strong emergence and weak emergence. Strong emergence is that something cannot be reduced to fundamental laws in principle. Weak emergence is that something cannot easily be reduced to fundamental laws in practice. In physics, by emergence, one usually means weak emergence. In particular, FQHE is weakly emergent, not strongly emergent.

Is there anything which is strongly emergent? It's hard to tell, some suspect that consciousness might be strongly emergent, but that's another topic.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Cato said:
TL;DR Summary: I have heard that the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is a true emergent property. I have never believed that emergent properties exist. Is this an example of one?

I do not think that true emergent properties -- as defined by behavior of matter that cannot be reduced to fundamental physical law -- exist. Yet I have been told that the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect is an example of an emergent property. What is the consensus?
Quantum many-body theory is full of "emergent properties". This is of course a buzz word. What's usually meant by this are collective excitations of a many-body system. These can often be described as "quasi particles", i.e., with a formalism of many-body quantum-field theory where these excitations can be approximately described in a similar way as "particle states" are described. These "quasi particles" need not be in any way related to true/elementary particles though. E.g., there are quasi particles with a "fractional charge", although of course there are no elementary particles with charges different from integer multiples of the elementary charge, ##e##.
 
Demystifier said:
One should distinguish between strong emergence and weak emergence. Strong emergence is that something cannot be reduced to fundamental laws in principle. Weak emergence is that something cannot easily be reduced to fundamental laws in practice. In physics, by emergence, one usually means weak emergence. In particular, FQHE is weakly emergent, not strongly emergent.

Is there anything which is strongly emergent? It's hard to tell, some suspect that consciousness might be strongly emergent, but that's another topic.
By your definition something is "strongly emerent" simply, if it cannot be understood by contemporarily known physical theories. I think all of condensed-matter physics is pretty far from that, although there are phenomena which cannot be explained entirely "from first principles".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
884
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
672
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 232 ·
8
Replies
232
Views
22K