Is the Function Analytic? Testing the Cauchy Riemann Equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on testing the analyticity of a function using the Cauchy-Riemann equations. The initial function failed the test, indicating it is not analytic. To demonstrate analyticity, one must utilize the definition of the complex derivative, specifically df/dz = lim_h->0 of (f(z+h) - f(z))/h. The limit must exist regardless of the approach path to z_0; if it differs along two paths, the function is confirmed as non-analytic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Knowledge of limits in complex analysis
  • Proficiency in defining and calculating complex derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations on function analyticity
  • Learn how to apply the definition of the complex derivative in various scenarios
  • Explore examples of functions that are analytic and those that are not
  • Investigate the concept of path dependence in limits within complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the conditions for function analyticity.

Blanchdog
Messages
56
Reaction score
22
Homework Statement
Use the definition of the complex derivative to find out if the function f(z) = z*
is analytic. (Hint: you may want to approach the point of interest from the real axis side
and from the imaginary axis side). What about the functions f(z) = z + z* and f(z) = z - z*
Relevant Equations
The definition of the derivative is df/dz = lim_h->0 of (f(z+h) - F(z))/h

The Cauchy-Riemann Equations are du/dx = dv/dy, and du/dy = -dv/dx
I tested the first function with the Cauchy Riemann equations and it seemed to fail that test, so I don't believe that function is analytic. However, I'm really not sure how to show that it is or is not analytic using the definition of the complex derivative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show that the limit in the definition does not exist at some (or all) points.
 
Blanchdog said:
The definition of the derivative is df/dz = lim_h->0 of (f(z+h) - f(z))/h
It might be a little more illuminating if you define the derivative as
$$f'(z_0) = \lim_{z \to z_0} \frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0}.$$ (The definition you gave might mislead you into thinking ##h## is real.) For the limit to exist, it shouldn't matter from which direction ##z## approaches ##z_0##. If you can show that the limit is different for two different paths, you've shown the derivative doesn't exist. The hint suggests two paths you should consider.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K