Is the Gamma Function Equal to Its Simplified Form?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two forms of the Gamma function, specifically focusing on the relationship between the Gamma function and its simplified forms. Participants are exploring various mathematical properties and identities related to the Gamma function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using induction to prove the equality, with one suggesting a change of variable to relate the integral representation to a Gaussian function. Others mention using identities involving the Gamma function to facilitate the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with multiple participants contributing different approaches to the proof. Some have suggested using induction, while others have proposed alternative identities. There is no explicit consensus on a single method, but various productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework context, which may limit the depth of their explorations. There are indications of missing information or potential misunderstandings regarding the application of certain identities and theorems.

homad2000
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello, I need help proving this:

[URL]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/GammaFunction/Inline177.gif[/URL] = [URL]http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/GammaFunction/Inline179.gif[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm also insterested in a proof of that.
 
You should be able to find gamma(1/2) easily enough. A change of variable makes the integral representation a gaussian. Now use gamma(z+1)=z*gamma(z) to find gamma(-1/2). Use that to find gamma(-3/2) etc. Use induction for the general case.
 
I'm so dumb, it can be proved by induction, of course.

\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right) = \frac{(-1)^{n} 2^{n}}{(2n-1)!} \sqrt{\pi}

Induction says that, if, for a specific n, P(n) is true and you manage to show that P(n+1) is true as well, then P(n) is true for all n from N.

So

\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-(n+1)\right) = \Gamma\left(\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right) -1\right) = \frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right)-1}}\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right) = \frac{(-1)\cdot 2}{(2n+1)} \Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}-n\right)

Now plug what it's in the hypothesis, and you'll get your answer.
 
Now use what I wrote to get a proof of your own for the "sister" equality

\Gamma\left(\frac{1}{2}+n\right) = \frac{(2n-1)!}{2^n}\, \sqrt{\pi}
 
brilliant! i haven't thought of induction! but i solved it using another identity:

%20formula%20}\operatorname{\Gamma}(\alpha)\operatorname{\Gamma}(1-\alpha)=\pi\,\csc\,\pi\alpha..gif
 

Attachments

  • %20formula%20}\operatorname{\Gamma}(\alpha)\operatorname{\Gamma}(1-\alpha)=\pi\,\csc\,\pi\alpha..gif
    %20formula%20}\operatorname{\Gamma}(\alpha)\operatorname{\Gamma}(1-\alpha)=\pi\,\csc\,\pi\alpha..gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 449
You wrote something that came out red as an error message. You can write it with our LaTeX code, or you may put a screenshot of your work.
 
using the identity:\Gamma(x) \Gamma(1-x) = \pi / sin(pi *x)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K