Is the graviton the only thing to find in LQG?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MTd2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton Lqg
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential existence of particles beyond gravitons in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) when considering a more classical limit. Participants explore whether LQG could lead to a Theory of Everything (TOE) and the implications of observable consequences from LQG, including concepts like cosmological bounces and the emergence of particles at low energy limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that LQG might reveal particles other than gravitons when transitioning to a classical limit, potentially including elements of Grand Unified Theories (GUTs).
  • Others argue that the focus of LQG research has shifted towards finding observable consequences, such as effects from cosmological bounces or gamma-ray bursts, rather than unobservable particles.
  • A participant suggests that LQG could be a TOE, where complex particles emerge from simpler behaviors at low energy limits, drawing an analogy to the Standard Model Lagrangian.
  • There is a mention of research connecting quantum geometry to Standard Model particles through knots and braids, although the progress of this line of inquiry is uncertain.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the existence of gravitons in LQG, noting that the concept of particles may not apply in curved spacetime.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes the need for a deeper conceptual understanding of geometry in quantum gravity, suggesting that geometry may consist of discrete events rather than continuous structures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a range of views on the existence of particles in LQG, with some expressing skepticism about gravitons and the applicability of particle concepts in curved spacetime. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the implications of LQG and its potential to yield observable consequences.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific interpretations of LQG and the unresolved nature of mathematical steps regarding the emergence of particles and their observability. The discussion also reflects varying degrees of familiarity with the underlying theories and concepts.

  • #31
sshai45 said:
I'm curious about this: how does the existence of this "surface" layer jive with Relativity's idea that there is no absolute "present"? Wouldn't that mean different observers would disagree on how the "heap" has grown?
In my view it certainly does. The "evolving surface layer" is a quantum version of a 3+1 foliation in GR, associated with a class of observers.

Also of course the view of "a present" or "the passage of time" is, here as in GR, a matter of perspective, one can equally well adopt the "unchanging spacetime" viewpoint.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I enjoyed reading this thread.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 264 ·
9
Replies
264
Views
23K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K