Is the Hadley Cell Responsible for Global Desert Patterns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsponderer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cell Impact
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
Sign up Log in
43 replies · 8K views
physicsponderer said:
It's not evident to me. Would you care to explain it?
Those very long contiguous streamers of cloud banks show the circular interaction of air masses on the scale of thousands of kilometres, notably between temperate and polar latitudes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and physicsponderer
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
Those very long contiguous streamers of cloud banks show the circular interaction of air masses on the scale of thousands of kilometres, notably between temperate and polar latitudes.
Would you care to expand on that?
 
physicsponderer said:
I had hoped for some discussion.
You got it. You used a crappy, and ill-specified source for your statement and you got a discussion of your crappy and ill-specified source. As said earlier in the thread, that's why PF insists on acceptable and well-specified sources.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Vanadium 50
phinds said:
You got it. You used a crappy, and ill-specified source for your statement and you got a discussion of your crappy and ill-specified source. As said earlier in the thread, that's why PF insists on acceptable and well-specified sources.
My post was a question. I thought it was clear that I am a beginner at meteorology. The source was simply to provide some context. I am indeed grateful for the interesting discussion.
 
physicsponderer said:
Would you care to expand on that?
At this point, I think it would make more sense to pass the conch to you, and ask you explain why - when you are directed to "very long contiguous streamers of cloud banks showing the circular interaction of air masses on the scale of thousands of kilometres, notably between temperate and polar latitudes" - you don't see that as "direct evidence of atmospheric circulation".

Alternately, what is the minimum you would reasonably expect to see in order to accept it as direct evidence of atmospheric circulation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
DaveC426913 said:
At this point, I think it would make more sense to pass the conch to you, and ask you explain why - when you are directed to "very long contiguous streamers of cloud banks showing the circular interaction of air masses on the scale of thousands of kilometres, notably between temperate and polar latitudes" - you don't see that as "direct evidence of atmospheric circulation".

Alternately, what is the minimum you would reasonably expect to see in order to accept it as direct evidence of atmospheric circulation?
Your statement was useful. I hadn't noticed those streamers, or rather, hadn't noticed how long they are, nor that their length does suggest atmospheric circulation. I meant, 'That's very useful, could you tell me a bit more about that?'. I've looked at that photo so many times over my lifetime, and I never thought properly about those streamers. Didn't really notice them at all.
Having said that, I think 'directly visible to the trained eye' would be more accurate than simply 'directly visible'.
 
physicsponderer said:
I wonder why the streamers of cloud are concave to the southwest when the westerlies are concave in the opposite direction in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Earth_Global_Circulation_-_en.svg ?
Sorry. Not 'concave' they are either rotating clockwise or rotating counterclockwise.

What we are seeing here is air masses in the southern hemisphere rotating clockwise, as expected:
1610250996938.png


Left pic: Northern hemisphere, Right pic: Southern Hemisphere:
1610251174301.png
BTW, Only the largest storms look like whirlpools. More typical storms look like commas with long tails. The head of the coma is the centre of the storm, so a comma whose head is clockwise from its tail is rotating clockwise, thus:
1610251627174.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
I thought 'atmospheric circulation' referred to circulation of air due to the Hadley cells, Ferrel cells, and/or polar cells, not air circulating around a zone of low pressure.
 
physicsponderer said:
... air circulating around a zone of low pressure.
Well, it is atmosphere. And it is circulating. So...
 
DaveC426913 said:
Left pic: Northern hemisphere, Right pic: Southern Hemisphere:
View attachment 275949
May I ask where you got these two diagrams from?
 
physicsponderer said:
May I ask where you got these two diagrams from?
Google. I searched images for 'clockwise storms in southern hemisphere' or somesuch.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Google. I searched images for 'clockwise storms in southern hemisphere' or somesuch.
I found them (I think) here at Roger Williams University website: https://rwu.pressbooks.pub/webboceanography/chapter/8-4-hurricanes/ which seems on the whole to be quite a useful source of knowledge for a meteorology beginner/amateur like myself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lomidrevo
physicsponderer said:
I found them (I think) here at Roger Williams University website: https://rwu.pressbooks.pub/webboceanography/chapter/8-4-hurricanes/ which seems on the whole to be quite a useful source of knowledge for a meteorology beginner/amateur like myself.
The book is focused mainly on oceanography, but anyway it looks interesting. Thanks for sharing.