Is the Heat Death of the Universe Inevitable and What Can We Do About It?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Delong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Death Heat Heat death
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the heat death of the universe, exploring its inevitability and potential alternatives such as the Big Crunch or Big Rip scenarios. Participants examine theoretical implications, the role of dark energy, and speculative ideas about the universe's fate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Speculative reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the heat death of the universe is a widely supported theory, while others suggest that dark energy's role is not fully understood, leaving room for alternative scenarios like the Big Crunch.
  • A hypothesis is proposed that a society could potentially extend its existence through advanced technology, such as habitats utilizing black hole Hawking radiation, but ultimately entropy would prevail.
  • There are conflicting views on whether dark energy could weaken over time, allowing gravity to dominate and potentially lead to a Big Crunch, with some arguing that current models do not support this.
  • Some participants mention the Big Rip as a possible outcome, contingent on the behavior of dark energy, which remains a topic of debate.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the relationship between dark energy and gravitational forces, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the implications of their statements.
  • Speculative ideas are introduced, such as the "Big Bounce" scenario, where the universe oscillates between hot and cold states, suggesting a cyclical nature of cosmic evolution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the inevitability of heat death, the role of dark energy, and the plausibility of alternative scenarios like the Big Crunch or Big Bounce. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of many claims, dependence on current models of dark energy and gravity, and unresolved questions about the universe's geometry and its implications for future scenarios.

  • #31
Sup_Principia said:
Chalnoth, you mention that the dark energy truly is a cosmological constant. The speed of light in a vacuum is a cosmological constant.
This is equivocation. The cosmological constant is a very specific parameter in General Relativity. The speed of light is a different constant with very different implications.

Sup_Principia said:
Are you stating that the Dark Energy has the same value throughout the universe? If this is true where is this found in litererature??

And what is the math that describes this dark energy cosmological constant?
I'm not so sure going into a discussion of the mathematics involved here would be that good for this thread. But suffice it to say that the fact that the cosmological constant is a constant is precisely what makes it cause the acceleration of the expansion of the universe.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
Sup_Principia said:
Since you are making it sound like you understand the "SuperInflation" concept as described in the article. Then explain what you think the article means by "SuperInflation" in regards to the "Big Bounce" theory; which would act in contradiction to a "Heat Death" model of the universe; which is based on the original post (OP)'s question??

Answering this question is what is called, engaging in physics!

With regards to the OP "what can we do about it":

I think the unltimate fate of the U, whether Big Rip, Oscilatory or a heat death, is completely beyond our realm of influence. It is like asking what an Ant can do to stop the Earth moving round the Sun - a crude analogy but meant to emphasize the totally limited influence we have on an entire Universes evolutionary path.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
Cosmo Novice said:
With regards to the OP "what can we do about it":

I think the unltimate fate of the U, whether Big Rip, Oscilatory or a heat death, is completely beyond our realm of influence. It is like asking what an Ant can do to stop the Earth moving round the Sun - a crude analogy but meant to emphasize the totally limited influence we have on an entire Universes evolutionary path.
I would also like to add that this analogy is expected to hold no matter what level of technology our species eventually reaches.
 
  • #34
In order to remove "personal heat", this thread has been edited. This thread should stay on topic, so any concerns about the editing should be sent to me (or any other Mentor) by PM.
 
  • #35
Chalnoth said:
I would also like to add that this analogy is expected to hold no matter what level of technology our species eventually reaches.

Thanks Chalnoth - I should have emphasized that I would expect the analogy to hold no matter what level of technology we could potentially attain.
 
  • #36
Yes, but not whatever technology the ants obtain! They are by far more persistent little buggers than we are.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K