MHB Is the Inflection Point at x = 7 Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter riri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concave Graph
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on identifying an error in the claim that the inflection point of the function f(x) occurs at x = 7. Participants analyze the implications of the function being twice differentiable and having critical points only at x = -1 and x = 3. It is suggested that the inflection point must lie between the critical points, indicating that x = 7 cannot be correct. Further exploration reveals that the function's structure leads to inconsistencies when trying to satisfy the given conditions, prompting a reevaluation of the problem's formulation. The conclusion emphasizes the need for clarity in the problem statement to avoid confusion about the function's characteristics.
riri
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hello again :)

I am doing a question in which I have to find the mistake that is in one of these points and must change one of these criteria to make it correct. So first I am drawing a graph to get an outline of what it looks like.

-f(x) is defined on (−∞, ∞) and differentiable twice through this domain
-f(x) has critical numbers only at x =−1 and x =3
-f(−5)=0, f(0)=−2, f(1)=0
-f(x) has its only inflection point at x = 7.

I am predicting that the last point, : that the inflection point at x=7 is the wrong one? because when I sketched out the points, I plotted the critical points, and the f(-5)=0, etc, but I don't know how to draw the "twice times differntiable" part...How do I know where I should draw the graph concave up, down?

Thank you! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
riri said:
Hello again :)

I am doing a question in which I have to find the mistake that is in one of these points and must change one of these criteria to make it correct. So first I am drawing a graph to get an outline of what it looks like.

-f(x) is defined on (−∞, ∞) and differentiable twice through this domain
-f(x) has critical numbers only at x =−1 and x =3
-f(−5)=0, f(0)=−2, f(1)=0
-f(x) has its only inflection point at x = 7.

I am predicting that the last point, : that the inflection point at x=7 is the wrong one? because when I sketched out the points, I plotted the critical points, and the f(-5)=0, etc, but I don't know how to draw the "twice times differntiable" part...How do I know where I should draw the graph concave up, down?

Thank you! :D

Your prediction is correct, but you have to convince your teacher why the inflexion point doesn't fall at $x=7$.

In fact, based on what we've been told, you could first let $f(x)=a(x+5)(x-1)(x+b)$, then you can figure out what the $a$ and $b$ values are, and from there you could determine that the inflexion point is at $x=\dfrac{1}{3}$.
 
Hello!

Thank you for your help!
Oh I see! After I drew the graph, I understood that the inflection point is near x=1.
What I'm confused on is how I can find the values of a and b using that equation you wrote?
I tried to expand it, but it clearly got more weird and long so if you could help me with this that would be great

Thank you!
 
We're given that $f(x)$ has critical numbers only at $x =−1$ and $x =3$, that means $f'(-1)=0$ and $f'(3)=0$, see if you could use that to figure out the values for both $a$ and $b$, okay? :D

Edit:

I didn't realized until now that the values for both $a$ and $b$ (that I have found above) wouldn't give us back $f(0)=-2$.

Upon re-reading the given information I have to say this problem is not that well-structured...

Thanks to greg1313 for letting me know there is something wrong about my solution. :D
 
Hello! Thank you :)

So basically that inflection point at x=1/3 you proposed can't be true is what you're saying, right?
After I looked at the problem and thought about it more I guess for this problem, it's not possible to give a direct inflection point, just what it should be between...I think?
 
1. f(x) is defined on (−∞, ∞) and differentiable twice through this domain
2. f(x) has critical numbers only at x =−1 and x =3
3. f(−5)=0, f(0)=−2, f(1)=0
4. f(x) has its only inflection point at x = 7.

Assume f(x) is cubic. Assume points 1, 2 and 3 are true and 4 is false (which it must be if f(x) is a cubic as any inflection point must lie between the critical numbers).

Now we need to justify our assumption that f(x) is cubic under conditions 2 and 3:

$$a(x+5)(x-1)(x-b)=0$$
$$a(x^2+4x-5)(x-b)=0$$
$$a(x^3+4x^2-5x-bx^2-4bx+5b)=0$$
$$ax^3+a(4-b)x^2-a(5+4b)x+5ab=0$$
$$5ab=-2\implies ab=-\dfrac25$$
$$f'(x)=3ax^2+2a(4-b)x-a(5+4b)$$
$$f'(-1)=3a-8a+2ab-5a-4ab=0\quad(*)$$
$$f'(3)=27a+24a-6ab-5a-4ab=0\quad(**)$$
The two equations $(*)$ and $(**)$ have no simultaneous solution other than $a=0$, so $f(x)$ cannot be a cubic under conditions 2 and 3.

Have you typed the problem correctly?
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K