Is the Normalization Independent of Time in Square Well Superposition?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the normalization of a superposition of two quantum states in a square well, specifically the wavefunction defined as \Psi(x,t) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})e^{-i \omega_1 t} + \sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})e^{-i \omega_2 t}. The participants analyze the integral for normalization, concluding that the normalization is independent of time for any time > 0. A critical point raised is the necessity of setting the boundary condition at l = 0 to ensure the wavefunction vanishes at the edges of the box, which is essential for the validity of the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wavefunctions and superposition
  • Familiarity with the concept of normalization in quantum states
  • Knowledge of trigonometric integrals and their applications in physics
  • Experience with complex exponentials and their role in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the normalization process for wavefunctions in quantum systems
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for integrating trigonometric functions
  • Investigate the role of superposition in quantum state evolution
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, wavefunction analysis, and normalization techniques in quantum systems.

Locrian
Messages
1,880
Reaction score
256
This comes from http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/Physics/8-04Quantum-Physics-ISpring2003/44AEFEB2-BD59-4647-9B54-3F2C57C2B57C/0/ps7.pdf" of the MIT coursework online. This problem seems straightforward to me and I believe I'm making a stupid math mistake of one kind or another, though its possible I'm (once again) missing something more important.
The problem asks you to normalize a superposition of two states and show that the normalization is good for any time > 0.
\Psi(x,t) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})e^{-i \omega_1 t} + \sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})e^{-i \omega_2 t}
1 = \int_l^{l+a} <\psi^*|\psi> \,dx = \int_l^{l+a} \Psi(x,t) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})e^{i \omega_1 t} + \sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})e^{i \omega_2 t} +
\sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})e^{-i \omega_1 t} + \sqrt{\frac{1}{a}}sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})e^{-i \omega_2 t}\,dx
Taking the complex square I get:
= \int_l^{l+a} \frac{1}{a}sin^2(\frac{\pi x}{a}) + \frac{1}{a}sin^2(\frac{2 \pi x}{a}) + \left(e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)} + e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}\right)\left(\frac{1}{a}sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})\right)\,dx
And integrating the first two pieces (but not the third yet)
=\left[\frac{x}{2a} - \frac{1}{4\pi}sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})\right]_l^{l+a} + \left[\frac{x}{2a} - \frac{1}{4\pi}sin(\frac{4\pi x}{a})\right]_l^{l+a}
+ \int_l^{l+a} (e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\left(\frac{1}{a}sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})\right)\,dx
Now working out those first two results in a 1/2 for each, so there's my entire probability right there. It would seem to follow that the third will be zero, making the normalization independent to time. That's how I thought this would work out, but either I'm wrong about that logic or my math isn't working - or both.
Looking at just that third part,
\int_l^{l+a} (e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\left(\frac{1}{a}sin(\frac{\pi x}{a})sin(\frac{2\pi x}{a})\right)\,dx
(e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\int_l^{l+a} \frac{2}{a} sin^2(\frac{\pi x}{a}) cos(\frac{\pi x}{a})\,dx
= (e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\left[\frac{1}{3\pi}sin^3(\frac{\pi x}{a})\right]_l^{l+a}
If I need to post any of the identities I'm using please let me know.
= (e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\left[\frac{1}{3\pi}sin^3(\frac{\pi (l+a)}{a})\right] - \left[\frac{1}{3\pi}sin^3(\frac{\pi l}{a})\right]
= (e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\left(\frac{1}{3\pi}\left[sin \frac{\pi l}{a}cos\pi + cos\frac{\pi l}{a}sin\pi\right]^3 - \left[\frac{1}{3\pi}sin^3(\frac{\pi l}{a})\right]\right)
= (e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\left[\frac{1}{3\pi}\left(-sin^3(\frac{\pi l}{a})\right) - \frac{1}{3\pi}sin^3(\frac{\pi l}{a})\right]
Which is not zero by any means, nor would the sum be 1.
Please let me know if you see any errors, and thanks for your time reading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Locrian, if you put l = 0 then you get zero like you should. So let me ask you, why should l = 0?

Also, (and this a totally irrelevant point) but in the fourth line from the bottom, the result of the integration should be
<br /> = (e^{it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)}+e^{-it(\omega_1 - \omega_2)})\left[\frac{\textbf{2}}{3\pi}sin^3(\frac{\pi x}{a})\right]_l^{l+a}<br />
so that when you differentiate you cancel the three and the pi and get 2/a back.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the correction!

As for l being zero, it shouldn't have to be, should it? I should be able to make it any arbitrary value, so long as the other side of the box is at l + a. Please hint me if I'm wrong about this.
 
You're welcome!

Here is a hint: You are free to choose your coordinates as you like, but the wavefunction does have to vanish at the edge of the box, so maybe the wavefunction you have written down already implicitly contains a choice for l?
 
Of course! Let me see if I understand:

The choice of coordinates for the edges of the box must have been chosen before the wave functions of the superposed states is determined; I can't just assume any value for the edges of the box now because then the state function given doesn't make any sense.

Am I to say then that, besides a (significant) error with a factor of two, I'm actually correct here, since plugging in 0 for l will give me the answer to the problem?

I appreciate your time physics monkey.
 
Yes, you've got it. They have already assumed the box goes from x=0 to x = a.

You are quite welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K