Is the number of twin primes really infinite?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinite Primes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The twin prime conjecture, which posits that there are infinitely many twin primes (pairs of primes of the form (p, p+2)), remains unproven and unrefuted. The discussion highlights Brun's Theorem, which addresses the distribution of twin primes, and references a recent paper that claims to prove the infinitude of twin primes, though it was later retracted due to errors. The community continues to explore various methods, including reductio ad absurdum, to tackle this longstanding mathematical question.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the twin prime conjecture
  • Basic knowledge of number theory
  • Awareness of mathematical proof techniques, particularly reductio ad absurdum
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Brun's Theorem and its implications on twin primes
  • Study the recent paper on twin primes from arXiv (http://arxiv.org/abs/math.NT/0405509)
  • Explore advanced techniques in number theory related to prime distributions
  • Investigate the history and current status of the twin prime conjecture
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in prime number theory and the complexities of mathematical conjectures.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi

I've been wondering...the conjecture which states that the number of twin primes is infinite has neither been proved nor disproved so far. We know that the number of primes is infinite and I have come across two methods of proving this.

My question is: why can't we actually prove that the number of twin primes, i.e. the number of distinct pairs of the form

(p, p+2)
or
(p-2, p)

where both members of the ordered pair are prime, is infinite? If we assume that the number is finite, would we reach an absurdity? If yes, then reductio-ad-absurdum should be the method of proof. Why then is it that no convincing methods have been proposed to prove this conjecture (or disprove it) for so many years?

Brun's Theorem (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BrunsConstant.html) describes (perhaps not as rigorously as we would like) the scarcity of twin primes. There are conjectures of all kinds related to twin primes and they are indeed, quite interesting...

Cheers
Vivek
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi

Thanks so much for this link...its very interesting...and captivating (just like math and science are in general). I do not know enough number theory yet to understand some techniques in this paper but I am learning and so hope to read this in depth sometime soon.

Cheers
Vivek
 
It's been proven wrong :D
 
AmirSafavi said:
It's been proven wrong :D

I hope you are referring to the proof in your previous post, and not the twin-prime conjecture itself !
 
How horrible must that feel, to have to withdraw such a proof =[
 
What was the error in the proof? They took the paper down...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
935
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K