Proof of the twin primes conjecture

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the twin primes conjecture, particularly focusing on recent advancements in understanding and proving the conjecture, including Yitang Zhang's contributions and the subsequent interest from other mathematicians. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight Yitang Zhang's work as a significant step forward in addressing the twin primes conjecture, noting his background and the initial skepticism surrounding the problem.
  • Others clarify that Zhang's results are not a complete proof but have reignited interest in the conjecture, leading to collaboration among mathematicians, including Terry Tao.
  • A participant expresses a personal interest in revisiting number theory to better understand the implications of Zhang's work and Tao's discussions.
  • One participant proposes specific criteria for identifying twin primes based on certain equations, suggesting a method for exploring the conjecture further.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Zhang's contributions have advanced the discussion around the twin primes conjecture, but there is no consensus on the nature of these advancements or the validity of the proposed criteria for twin primes.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference the complexity of the mathematical concepts involved, indicating that not all participants may fully grasp the implications of the recent developments. There are also unresolved aspects regarding the completeness of Zhang's proof and the proposed criteria for twin primes.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in number theory, mathematical conjectures, and the collaborative efforts in mathematical research may find this discussion relevant.

StatGuy2000
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,073
Reaction score
1,155
I have just found links to a few articles discussing the proof of the twin prime conjecture by Yitang Zhang, a once obscure mathematician working as a lecturer at the University of New Hampshire, and who according to reports had difficulty finding academic work and worked as an accountant and a Subway sandwich shop.

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/05/twin-primes/2/

http://www.unh.edu/news/releases/2013/may/bp16zhang.cfm

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/science/solving-a-riddle-of-primes.html

For those not familiar with the conjecture, the twin primes conjecture is the following:

For every natural number k such that there are infinitely many prime pairs p and p' such that p'-p=2k
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, not the proof, just a big step forward. This problem was sort of relegated to the impossible pile. Zhang's approach got lots of other mathematicians to start thinking about it. For example Terry Tao has become interested and posted some results:

http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2013/06/23/the-distribution-of-primes-in-densely-divisible-moduli/

Now the problem is getting a lot of attention from people who pretty much ignored it in the past. This is good. Folks are cooperating in the polymath8 project:

http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Bounded_gaps_between_primes
 
I see. So it appears that Zhang's paper was advancing the research forward in thinking about the twin primes conjecture.

Admittedly, it's been over a decade since I last studied number theory, so much of Terry Tao's discussion is a little vague to me. This will be one of my pet projects -- to refresh myself with advanced math material!
 
I propose the following criteria of twin primes conjecture:
Natural numbers N1=6n+5 and N2=6n+7, n=0,1,2,3,..
are twins if and only if no one of three equations
n=6xy-x+y-1; x>=1; y>=1
n=6xy-x-y-1; x>=1; y>=x;
n=6xy+x+y-1; x>=1; y>=x;
has integer solution.
Attached: convenient C++ program for finding primes
 

Attachments

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K