Is the phase shift of a tuned mass damper ##\frac{\pi}{2}## or ##\pi##?

Click For Summary
The phase shift of a tuned mass damper (TMD) in relation to the oscillation of a surrounding structure is debated, with simple resonance theory suggesting a phase shift of π/2, while many animations depict it as π. Conflicting sources indicate that ideally, a 90-degree phase difference is achieved by tuning the TMD to the natural frequency of the structure, yet some sources assert that TMDs operate 180 degrees out of phase. The discussion highlights that the force of the TMD should counteract the velocity of the structure, leading to a phase shift of π at resonance due to frictional forces. Additionally, the interaction between coupled resonant systems can result in complex phase relationships, but the central frequency still maintains a π phase shift. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effectively implementing TMDs in vibration control systems.
greypilgrim
Messages
581
Reaction score
44
Hi.

What is the phase shift of a tuned mass damper with respect to the oscillation of the surrounding structure, such as the big pendulum in Taipei 101? Simple resonance theory would suggest ##\frac{\pi}{2}##, but animations in explanatory videos often depict them in anti-phase, i.e. a phase shift of ##\pi##.

I tried Google but couldn't get a clear result. This document here even seems to be contradictory, on p. 2 it says
The ideal extent of phase difference between the motion of the TMD mass and that of the structure, i.e. 90 degrees, is attained by tuning the TMD to the natural frequency of the structural mode targeted for damping.
whereas on p. 5
Typically TMDs are integrated into the building frame in such a way that the TMD's mass moves 180 degrees out of phase with the building.
Some sources even explain those systems with destructive interference (where anti-phase would make sense), but isn't that something very different and not really related to resonance?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Start with basic vibration theory for a simple spring-mass system without damping. The force of the spring is proportional to the position of the mass. If you add an external force that is proportional to the position of the mass, you change the spring constant, which changes the natural frequency without adding damping.

Now take a simple spring-mass-damper system. The force of the damper is proportional to the velocity of the mass. The velocity is zero at the extreme positions, and maximum at zero position. If you are using a TMD to reduce vibration, you want the force of the tuned mass to be proportional to and opposite the velocity of the structure. The force of the tuned mass is proportional to the relative displacement between the tuned mass and the vibrating structure.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes DaveE and berkeman
Any resonator will present a purely resistive, or frictional, force at its resonant frequency. The generator then does work against this friction. As friction opposes the generator, we say the phase shift is pi radians.
Where we have two coupled resonant devices, the combined system may have a double resonance, depending on the amount of coupling. But at the centre frequency it will still create a phase shift of pi radians.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
648
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K