Is the Proof of E=mc² Valid for Accelerating Objects in Special Relativity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pc2-brazil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Proof
  • #31
pc2-brazil said:
OK, I was forgetting about centripetal acceleration.

Vector calculus is a very powerful tool in obtaining the most general solutions. This is why I mentioned that the solution I provided is much more general than the one you found. Where did you find iit? What book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
starthaus said:
Vector calculus is a very powerful tool in obtaining the most general solutions. This is why I mentioned that the solution I provided is much more general than the one you found. Where did you find iit? What book?
Actually, I found it in an online video: http://www.youtube.com/user/matmania1#p/c/7E2FA65CB78B54B0/14/4cS5qvNJJmA". This video is in Portuguese.
My knowledge is somewhat fragmented, since I'm not following a course (just so you have an idea, I've learned the substitution method in integration for the first time today in order to understand a particular step in your derivation). I'm learning from what the Internet has to offer. This forum is a very helpful resource.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #33
pc2-brazil said:
Actually, I found it in an online video: http://www.youtube.com/user/matmania1#p/c/7E2FA65CB78B54B0/14/4cS5qvNJJmA". This video is in Portuguese.
My knowledge is somewhat fragmented, since I'm not following a course. I'm learning from what the Internet has to offer. This forum is a very helpful resource.

If I may suggest an internet source, find C.Moller's book on relativity (The Theory of Relativity). It is very good, a model of rigor and it is...free. I think that it is one of the best, most complete books written on the subject. It covers both SR and GR.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
starthaus said:
If I may suggest an internet source, find C.Moller's book on relativity (The Theory of Relativity). It is very good, a model of rigor and it is...free. I think that it is one of the best, most complete books written on the subject. It covers both SR and GR.

Thank you for the suggestion, I will have a look.
By the way: you've answered to my reply so fast that you may haven't noticed the edition I made.
 
  • #35
Also this reference:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #36
Dickfore said:
Also this reference:

http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/"

Thank you too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Undergrad Best Derivation of E=mc^2 - Fdx = V^2 dm
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
High School What is m in Kinetic Energy? Relativistic mass or Rest mass?
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
Undergrad Escape velocity near a black hole: Newtonian or Special Relativity?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Undergrad E=mc^2 and acceleration
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Undergrad The Energy - Momentum Equation vs the Energy - Mass Equation
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
13K
High School Need tips to understand Relativistic Energy in Special Relativity
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
High School Relativistic Photon Mass: Can It Exist?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Undergrad Deriving e=mc^2, how is it possible?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad Relativistic Uniform Circular Motion
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Undergrad Uncovering a Decent Proof of E=mc^2
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K