Is the Rover Mission Halted Due to Dust-Covered Solar Panels?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hagopbul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Rover
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the status of the Mars rover missions, particularly focusing on the impact of dust storms on solar panels and the operational challenges faced by the Opportunity rover. Participants explore the implications of dust coverage on solar energy collection and the potential for communication recovery.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the Opportunity rover may have stopped functioning due to dust covering its solar panels, impacting its ability to charge batteries.
  • Others note that Opportunity went silent during a dust storm and has not been heard from since, raising concerns about its survival through the Martian winter.
  • It is mentioned that both Spirit and Opportunity had previously survived dust storms, benefiting from winds that cleaned their solar panels, but the recent storm was particularly severe.
  • Some participants express curiosity about why Opportunity is not nuclear powered, speculating that cost may be a factor, while others provide context about the design and landing challenges of the rovers.
  • There is a discussion about the longevity of the rovers, with some noting that Opportunity exceeded its expected lifespan significantly, which raises questions about mission expectations and design life.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the reasons for Opportunity's current status and the implications of dust storms. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of potential recovery methods or the rationale behind the power sources used for the rovers.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the operational capabilities of the rovers and the environmental conditions on Mars, which may not be fully addressed. The impact of dust storms on solar energy collection and rover functionality remains a point of uncertainty.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in Mars exploration, rover technology, and the challenges of operating in extraterrestrial environments may find this discussion relevant.

hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
Hello all:

I was seeing all the news about rover mission , but catch my eyes that rover was stopped due to a dust storm , maybe it's solar panels is covered with dust and the batteries charging in its minimum for that reason .
is that possible

best
H
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Definitely.
There are two rovers up there right now:
Curiosity: https://mars.nasa.gov/msl/
Opportunity: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mars-exploration-rover-opportunity-mer/

Actually there are others - but they stopped working years ago.

Opportunity is the one that is in trouble. It went silent at the start of a Martian planetary dust storm and hasn't been heard from since. If they cannot contact is soon, it will perish in the cold Martian winter.

Curiosity also went through that dust storm. But it is nuclear powered and so was able to continue operations throughout the darkness.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Janosh89, russ_watters and Wrichik Basu
hagopbul said:
Hello all:

I was seeing all the news about rover mission , but catch my eyes that rover was stopped due to a dust storm , maybe it's solar panels is covered with dust and the batteries charging in its minimum for that reason .
is that possible

best
H
I believe the Spirit and Opportunity rovers survived much longer than expected because wind cleaned the solar panels more than anticipated.
 
CWatters said:
I believe the Spirit and Opportunity rovers survived much longer than expected because wind cleaned the solar panels more than anticipated.
The normal planetary cycle puts a windy summer season after the dust storm season. This is followed by the cold winter.
Both Spirit and Opportunity had survived dust storms before - and enjoyed a bit of a cleaning during the windy summer that followed. But this past storm was dustier than usual and shut Opportunity down completely. The hope was that summer winds would dust off the solar panels enough to revive communications. But that has not happened. In order for Opportunity to weather the winter, it needs to be positioned to capture as much sun as it can get. If this does not happen, it will suffer the same fate as it's sister rover, Spirit - some of its components will be damaged by the intense cold - and it will not be possible to continue its mission.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
May I ask why opportunity isn’t nuclear powered, I would assume cost but a lost rover must be more expensive than nuclear power. By the way I do not know much about the rovers
 
.Scott said:
Both Spirit and Opportunity had survived dust storms before - and enjoyed a bit of a cleaning during the windy summer that followed. But this past storm was dustier than usual and shut Opportunity down completely. The hope was that summer winds would dust off the solar panels enough to revive communications. But that has not happened. In order for Opportunity to weather the winter, it needs to be positioned to capture as much sun as it can get. If this does not happen, it will suffer the same fate as it's sister rover, Spirit - some of its components will be damaged by the intense cold - and it will not be possible to continue its mission.
RIP Spirit.
Stephenk53 said:
May I ask why opportunity isn’t nuclear powered, I would assume cost but a lost rover must be more expensive than nuclear power. By the way I do not know much about the rovers
Cost is the answer, but it's worth noting that Spirit outlived it's intended 90 day mission by a factor of 20, so it wasn't a "loss" in the sense of a failed mission.
 
Stephenk53 said:
May I ask why opportunity isn’t nuclear powered, I would assume cost but a lost rover must be more expensive than nuclear power. By the way I do not know much about the rovers
It's not just the cost of the rover. Spirit and Opportunity were lighter vehicles and so they were able to land using a relatively simple heat shield; parachute; airbag; rocket sequence. Curiosity was too heavy for that and needed a more sophisticated thruster-guided heat shield; parachute; rocket-powered skyhook; lowering by cable. It was much more complicated.

Given the track record for landing craft on Mars, the Curiosity landing was incredibly bold. Certainly the experience gained with landing Spirit ans Opportunity contributed to the ability to get the much larger Curiosity nicely placed onto Mars.

Also, the design life for Opportunity and Spirit was 90 days. So surviving dust season was not an initial objective.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and russ_watters
  • #10
davenn said:
but considering it was only expected to last ~ 90 days. Lasting 15 years in such a harsh environment is pretty awesome :smile:
If that longevity were applied to Humans we would live 5170 years. Scary or exciting?
 
  • #11
To be fair I think the expected lifespan is always on the cautious side, they would have been disappointed if it had actually keeled over after 90 days.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and russ_watters
  • #12
Screen Shot 2019-02-14 at 7.29.09 AM.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-02-14 at 7.29.09 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-02-14 at 7.29.09 AM.png
    35.3 KB · Views: 501

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K