Is the Schwarzschild Radius of a Proton Really That Small?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Schwarzschild radius of a proton is calculated using the formula R = (2MG)/c², where m = 1.67E-27 kg (mass of the proton), G = 6.67E-11 m³ kg⁻¹ s⁻² (gravitational constant), and c = 3E8 m/s (speed of light). The resulting Schwarzschild radius is approximately 2.48E-54 meters, which is significantly smaller than the proton's radius of 0.8 femtometers (fm). This calculation confirms that protons do not behave as black holes due to their extremely small Schwarzschild radius.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with fundamental physics constants (G, c)
  • Basic proficiency in scientific notation
  • Knowledge of particle physics, specifically proton properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Schwarzschild radius in black hole physics
  • Learn about the properties and behavior of subatomic particles
  • Explore the relationship between mass and gravitational effects in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the concept of black holes and their formation criteria
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and general relativity, particularly in understanding the properties of protons and black holes.

toto93
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Calculate the schwarzschild radius of a proton



2. R = (2MG)/c^2



3. I plugged in m= 1.67E-27, G=6.67E-11 and c=3E-8 and got out an answer of 2.5E-54. This seems ridiculously small, but I can't figure our if I'm doing something wrong or if it really is just that tiny. The next question has us compare it to the radius of a proton, 0.8fm, so I'm guessing my answer should be somewhere around that value. If someone could help figure out what's going on I'd be grateful, Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, toto93. Welcome to PF.
Your calculation looks correct. You are asked to compare the result to the known radius of the proton. That doesn't necessarily mean that the two radii should be similar.
 
Okay, I didnt think there was anything wrong with the maths it just seemed to be a ridiculously tiny number. The next questions asks us to compare it to see the possibility of it being a black hole, so I just thought they would be reasonably close. I guess it makes sense to be far smaller because then at least not everything is made of black holes. Thanks
 
I just did the calculations and my answer came out as 7.427E-46. Did you check your calculations or did I miss a conversion at some point?
 
Just done the calculation again, I'm fairly sure I did the calculation right and I got the same answer. It might be a problem with units, not sure. I'm just going to go with 2.48E-54 and hope it's right, I can't see any problems with my calculation at least
 
You can check your answer here
 
Thanks, that's really helpful, at least I know I'm pretty much certainly right. Thanks again,
 
Ok, I guess I messed up on my units. Wouldn't be the first time. Sorry 'bout that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K