Is the Schwarzschild Radius of a Proton Really That Small?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the Schwarzschild radius of a proton, a concept in general relativity, and its comparison to the actual radius of a proton. Participants are exploring the implications of their calculations and the significance of the resulting values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are sharing their calculations of the Schwarzschild radius using the formula R = (2MG)/c^2 and discussing the surprisingly small results. There are questions about the correctness of the calculations and the relevance of comparing the Schwarzschild radius to the physical size of a proton.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed their calculations and are questioning the implications of the small radius. There is an acknowledgment of potential unit conversion issues, and while some guidance has been offered, no consensus has been reached on the calculations or their interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the depth of their exploration and the types of assistance they can seek. There is an ongoing discussion about the significance of the small Schwarzschild radius in the context of black holes.

toto93
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Calculate the schwarzschild radius of a proton



2. R = (2MG)/c^2



3. I plugged in m= 1.67E-27, G=6.67E-11 and c=3E-8 and got out an answer of 2.5E-54. This seems ridiculously small, but I can't figure our if I'm doing something wrong or if it really is just that tiny. The next question has us compare it to the radius of a proton, 0.8fm, so I'm guessing my answer should be somewhere around that value. If someone could help figure out what's going on I'd be grateful, Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, toto93. Welcome to PF.
Your calculation looks correct. You are asked to compare the result to the known radius of the proton. That doesn't necessarily mean that the two radii should be similar.
 
Okay, I didnt think there was anything wrong with the maths it just seemed to be a ridiculously tiny number. The next questions asks us to compare it to see the possibility of it being a black hole, so I just thought they would be reasonably close. I guess it makes sense to be far smaller because then at least not everything is made of black holes. Thanks
 
I just did the calculations and my answer came out as 7.427E-46. Did you check your calculations or did I miss a conversion at some point?
 
Just done the calculation again, I'm fairly sure I did the calculation right and I got the same answer. It might be a problem with units, not sure. I'm just going to go with 2.48E-54 and hope it's right, I can't see any problems with my calculation at least
 
You can check your answer here
 
Thanks, that's really helpful, at least I know I'm pretty much certainly right. Thanks again,
 
Ok, I guess I messed up on my units. Wouldn't be the first time. Sorry 'bout that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K