Is the sequence {a_n} monotone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pcvt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence {a_n} = n + [(-1)^n]/n is monotone increasing for n > 1. The proof involves demonstrating that the difference {a_{n+1}} - {a_n} is non-negative, which simplifies to proving n(n-1) > 0 for n > 1. This can be established through basic calculus by analyzing the function y = x(x - 1), which is positive for x > 1. The derivative of the function confirms its increasing nature, supporting the conclusion that the sequence is indeed monotone increasing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sequences and monotonicity
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction
  • Basic calculus concepts, including derivatives
  • Graphical analysis of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study mathematical induction techniques in depth
  • Learn about monotonic sequences and their properties
  • Explore calculus derivatives and their applications in proving inequalities
  • Investigate graphical methods for analyzing functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying real analysis, mathematicians interested in sequences, and educators teaching calculus and induction methods.

pcvt
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


State whether or not the sequence {a_n} = n+[(-1)^n]/n is monotone or not and justify.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


It clearly appears to be monotone increasing, so I attempt to prove this. I've tried using induction and tried to prove that {an+1} -{an} >= 0. However, I've got it down to proving n(n-1)>0 for n>1, but I'm not sure how to prove this using just the basic axioms of analysis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pcvt said:

Homework Statement


State whether or not the sequence {a_n} = n+[(-1)^n]/n is monotone or not and justify.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


It clearly appears to be monotone increasing, so I attempt to prove this. I've tried using induction and tried to prove that {an+1} -{an} >= 0. However, I've got it down to proving n(n-1)>0 for n>1, but I'm not sure how to prove this using just the basic axioms of analysis.
What basic axioms are you talking about? Your approach using induction sounds good to me.
 
Well, would it be possible to redefine a new variable so that one can prove n(n-1)>0 for n>1 using induction? It seems possible to use induction but I'm not sure what to do about the fact that the statement isn't true for n=1.
 
I suppose you could do it by induction, but proving that n(n - 1) > 0 for n > 1 seems too trivial to bother with this technique. One look at the graph of y = x(x - 1) for x > 1 should convince anyone that the inequality is true.

You could also prove this inequality by noticing that for y = x2 - x has a derivative that is positive for x > 1/2, and that y(0) = y(1) = 0. The graph of this function crosses the x-axis at (1, 0) and increases without bound.

The expression n(n - 1), where n is an integer, agrees with x(x - 1) for all integer values of x.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K