MHB Is the Squeeze Theorem Correctly Applied Here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycmathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the limit of x^2 • f(x) approaches 0 as x approaches 0, given that 0 ≤ f(x) ≤ 1 for all x. The initial steps involve multiplying the inequality by x^2, leading to the conclusion that 0 ≤ x^2 • f(x) ≤ x^2. Participants confirm the correctness of this approach and emphasize the need to note that x^2 is non-negative for all real x. The final step is to apply the squeeze theorem to finalize the proof. This method effectively demonstrates the limit's validity.
nycmathdad
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
If 0 ≤ f(x) ≤ 1 for every x, show that
lim [x^2 • f(x)] = 0.
x--> 0

Let me see.

0 ≤ f(x) ≤ 1

Multiply all terms by x^2.

0 • x^2 ≤ x^2• f(x) ≤ 1 • x^2

0 ≤ x^2 • f(x) ≤ x^2

Is this right so far? If correct, what's next?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi nycmathdad

Looks good. To conclude the proof, apply the squeeze theorem to the inequality $0\leq x^{2}f(x)\leq x^{2}$ you derived.

One small note: for your argument to be 100% buttoned-up, you should mention that $x^{2}\geq 0$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$. This is necessary to ensure that the implication $0\leq f(x)\leq 1\,\Longrightarrow\, 0\leq x^{2}f(x)\leq x^{2}$ really does follow.
 
GJA said:
Hi nycmathdad

Looks good. To conclude the proof, apply the squeeze theorem to the inequality $0\leq x^{2}f(x)\leq x^{2}$ you derived.

One small note: for your argument to be 100% buttoned-up, you should mention that $x^{2}\geq 0$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$. This is necessary to ensure that the implication $0\leq f(x)\leq 1\,\Longrightarrow\, 0\leq x^{2}f(x)\leq x^{2}$ really does follow.

Ok. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K