MHB Is the Sum of n^2 Terms in an Arithmetic Sequence Limited to 1?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether there is only one arithmetic sequence where the sum of the first n terms equals n^2. The derived formula for the nth term is an = 2n - 1, indicating a unique sequence. The sum of n terms can be expressed as a quadratic polynomial, which must have specific coefficients for the sequence to hold true. The pattern observed shows that the first term is 1, and subsequent terms increase by 2, confirming the uniqueness of the sequence. Thus, there is indeed only one arithmetic sequence that satisfies the condition.
stamenkovoca02
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How many different arithmetic sequences have the sum of the first n terms n^2?
solution an= 2n-1.Does that mean there is only one arithmetic sequence?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the sum of the first $n$ terms must equal $n^2$ for all $n$, then yes, such sequence is unique. To see why, write the sum of $n$ terms using the first term $a_1$ and the difference $d$. This is going to be a quadratic polynomial. Its leading coefficient has to be equal to 1, and the other two have to be 0.
 
The first term must be 1. The second term must satisfy 1+ x= 4 so x= 3. The third term must satisfy 4+ x= 9 so x=5. The fourth term must satisfy 9+ x= 16 so x= 7.. The fifth term must satisfy 16+ X= 25 so x=9. Do you see a pattern?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top