Is the Supremum/Infimum of Monotonic Functions Always at Infinity?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wayneckm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Property
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
3 replies · 5K views
wayneckm
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

For a monotonic increasing/decreasing function [tex]f(x)[/tex] on [tex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/tex], we can only have supremum/infimum which is occurred at [tex]x = \infty[/tex] with value [tex]\lim_{x\uparrow \infty}f(x)[/tex] Otherwise, if it was a maximum/minimum, it would violate the assumption of monotonicity.

Am I correct on the above statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on your definition of monotonic. There are notions of strict and weak monotonicity; strict means that the function is strictly increasing/decreasing, i.e. x<y means f(x)<f(y) or f(x)>f(y).

Weak means only that x<y means [tex]f(x) \leq f(y)[/tex] or [tex]f(x) \geq f(y)[/tex].

If you're only looking at weak monotonicity, then you can have the function be constant after some value and achieve a maximum/minimum value. For strong monotonicity this can't occur

Also note that the limit as x goes to infinity doesn't have to exist (which means that the function is unbounded).

Obviously the same stuff applies as x goes to minus infinity also for the other bound
 
Thanks for the reply.

Ya, I forgot to state in my sense it is in strict mode.

So in summary, there does not exist maximum/minimum for a strictly increasing/decreasing function in the case of function [tex]f[/tex] on [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]?