Is the traditional method for calculating molar heat of dissolution accurate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PVnRT81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Heat
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The traditional method for calculating the molar heat of dissolution using the formula q=mwatercΔt is accurate when considering the heat absorbed by the solvent alone. However, the instructor's suggestion to include the mass of the solute in the calculation is partially correct, as it acknowledges that the solute also absorbs heat during dissolution. The discussion highlights that while textbooks may omit the solute's mass due to its negligible size compared to the solvent, this can lead to inaccuracies in specific scenarios. Ultimately, the heat produced by dissolution affects both the solute and solvent, necessitating a comprehensive approach to heat transfer calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles, particularly heat transfer.
  • Familiarity with the concept of specific heat capacity (c).
  • Knowledge of molar calculations and stoichiometry.
  • Basic understanding of calorimetry and heat measurement techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of solute mass on heat transfer in dissolution processes.
  • Learn about calorimetry techniques and their applications in measuring heat changes.
  • Study the concept of specific heat capacity and its variations with different substances.
  • Explore advanced thermodynamic principles related to heat transfer in solutions.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and researchers interested in thermodynamics, calorimetry, and the accurate measurement of heat changes during dissolution processes.

PVnRT81
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose I have a solute of mass "x" grams. I dissolve this in "y" mL of water. The temperature of the water increases by "z" degrees Celsius.

I calculate the molar heat of dissolution of the solute by measuring, using q=mwatercΔt, the heat absorbed by water (in kJ), and then dividing by the moles of solute.

The above mentioned method is found in many reference textbooks as well as various sources across the web.

However, my science instructor insists that this method is wrong, and to calculate the heat transferred, you should include the mass of the solute as well.

Thus, when measuring the heat absorbed it should look like this:

q=msolute + solventcΔt

I find this quite unintuitive; I don't agree with my instructor on this matter. Am I right or wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wrong.

Imagine that after dissolution finished you are adding another, identical amount of heat, this time without dissolving anything. What mass would you use now to calculate Δt?

(To be exact your instructor is in a way also wrong, but (s)he is much closer to the correct answer. Their solution assumes cp didn't change, which is not exactly true.)
 
Borek said:
Wrong.

Imagine that after dissolution finished you are adding another, identical amount of heat, this time without dissolving anything. What mass would you use now to calculate Δt?

(To be exact your instructor is in a way also wrong, but (s)he is much closer to the correct answer. Their solution assumes cp didn't change, which is not exactly true.)

I would use the mass that is gaining heat - which is the total mass in this case. But in the original scenario, the solute is losing heat, and the solvent is gaining heat... so, wouldn't it make more sense to use the mass of water only because the solute itself is not gaining heat?
 
Last edited:
Solute is not losing heat! Heat is produced by the dissolution, and it has to heat up both water and the solute. Otherwise after the dissolution you will have a hot solvent and cold solute - which is apparently not the case.
 
Borek said:
Solute is not losing heat! Heat is produced by the dissolution, and it has to heat up both water and the solute. Otherwise after the dissolution you will have a hot solvent and cold solute - which is apparently not the case.

Ah! That clears it up... however, I am still curious as to why some websites/textbooks choose not to include the mass of the solute.
 
Sometimes it is negligible (much smaller than the mass of the solvent).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Chemistry Thermodynamics: The molar enthelpy of a solution
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
What Is the Molarity of Potassium Ions in a Potassium Sulfite Solution?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Calculate the final temperature of the solution
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Chemistry Calculating Molar Solubility of CaCO3: A Puzzling Problem
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Calculate the molar heat of combustion of anthracene
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Calculating Molar Heat of Neutralization
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Molar Enthalpy of Salt: Calculation and Heat Sources
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Specific Heat Problem (did something wrong?)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
How to calculate heat from enthelpy of reaction
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Chemistry Thermochemistry and the heat of complete combustion
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K